The Central African Republic has a population density of 22.2 people per square mile compared to 174.4 people in Mexico. The Central African Republic has 1,257,950 sq ft of land per person vs 162,251 sq ft in Mexico. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, the Central African Republic and Mexico are ranked 186th and 123rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. The Central African Republic has 0.07% of the world's population and 0.42% of the land area of all countries, compared to 1.61% of the population and 1.31% of the land area for Mexico, hence the population density in the Central African Republic is 87.3% lower than in Mexico.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 22.2 ppl/mi² | 174.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 186/197 | 123/197 |
| Population |
5662456
|
132790957
|
| Land area | 240,534 sq mi | 750,563 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 1,257,942 sq ft | 159,899 sq ft |
| Rural population | 55.9% | 18.1% |
| Urban population | 44.1% | 81.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 17.3% |
the Central African Republic vs Mexico:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in the Central African Republic increased by 27.1%, compared to a 25.4% growth in Mexico.
In 2004, the Central African Republic ranked 180th for population density and is in 186th place now. Mexico was 120th in 2004 and ranks 123rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 22.2 | 174.4 |
| 2023 | 21.4 | 172.9 |
| 2022 | 21.2 | 171.4 |
| 2021 | 21.3 | 170.1 |
| 2020 | 20.9 | 168.9 |
| 2019 | 20.6 | 167.6 |
| 2018 | 20.3 | 166 |
| 2017 | 19.9 | 164.4 |
| 2016 | 19.6 | 162.9 |
| 2015 | 19.2 | 161.3 |
| 2014 | 19.2 | 159.6 |
| 2013 | 19.3 | 157.7 |
| 2012 | 19.2 | 155.6 |
| 2011 | 19 | 153.5 |
| 2010 | 18.7 | 151.4 |
| 2009 | 18.8 | 149.2 |
| 2008 | 19 | 147.1 |
| 2007 | 18.6 | 144.9 |
| 2006 | 18.2 | 142.9 |
| 2005 | 17.8 | 141 |
| 2004 | 17.4 | 139.1 |
| 2003 | 17.1 | 137.2 |
| 2002 | 16.7 | 135.3 |
| 2001 | 16.3 | 133.4 |
| 2000 | 15.9 | 131.4 |
| 1999 | 15.5 | 129.4 |
| 1998 | 15.1 | 127.3 |
| 1997 | 14.7 | 125.3 |
| 1996 | 14.3 | 123.2 |
| 1995 | 13.9 | 121.1 |
| 1994 | 13.5 | 118.9 |
| 1993 | 13.1 | 116.8 |
| 1992 | 12.7 | 114.6 |
| 1991 | 12.3 | 112.5 |
| 1990 | 11.9 | 110.3 |
| 1989 | 11.6 | 108.2 |
| 1988 | 11.3 | 106.2 |
| 1987 | 11.1 | 104.1 |
| 1986 | 11 | 102 |
| 1985 | 10.8 | 100 |
| 1984 | 10.7 | 97.9 |
| 1983 | 10.5 | 95.9 |
| 1982 | 10.4 | 93.8 |
| 1981 | 10.3 | 91.8 |
| 1980 | 10.2 | 89.7 |
| 1979 | 10.1 | 87.5 |
| 1978 | 9.97 | 85.2 |
| 1977 | 9.87 | 83 |
| 1976 | 9.76 | 80.8 |
| 1975 | 9.62 | 78.6 |
| 1974 | 9.43 | 76.4 |
| 1973 | 9.25 | 74.2 |
| 1972 | 9.08 | 72 |
| 1971 | 8.9 | 69.8 |
| 1970 | 8.72 | 67.7 |
| 1969 | 8.53 | 65.6 |
| 1968 | 8.34 | 63.5 |
| 1967 | 8.15 | 61.5 |
| 1966 | 7.97 | 59.5 |
| 1965 | 7.81 | 57.5 |
| 1964 | 7.65 | 55.7 |
| 1963 | 7.5 | 53.9 |
| 1962 | 7.35 | 52.1 |
| 1961 | 7.21 | 50.5 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 44.1% | 81.9% |
| 2023 | 43.6% | 81.6% |
| 2022 | 43.1% | 81.3% |
| 2021 | 42.6% | 81% |
| 2020 | 42.2% | 80.7% |
| 2019 | 41.8% | 80.4% |
| 2018 | 41.4% | 80.2% |
| 2017 | 41% | 79.9% |
| 2016 | 40.6% | 79.6% |
| 2015 | 40.3% | 79.3% |
| 2014 | 40% | 79% |
| 2013 | 39.7% | 78.7% |
| 2012 | 39.4% | 78.4% |
| 2011 | 39.1% | 78.1% |
| 2010 | 38.9% | 77.8% |
| 2009 | 38.7% | 77.5% |
| 2008 | 38.5% | 77.2% |
| 2007 | 38.3% | 76.9% |
| 2006 | 38.2% | 76.6% |
| 2005 | 38.1% | 76.3% |
| 2004 | 38% | 76% |
| 2003 | 37.9% | 75.7% |
| 2002 | 37.8% | 75.4% |
| 2001 | 37.7% | 75% |
| 2000 | 37.6% | 74.7% |
| 1999 | 37.6% | 74.4% |
| 1998 | 37.5% | 74.2% |
| 1997 | 37.4% | 73.9% |
| 1996 | 37.3% | 73.7% |
| 1995 | 37.2% | 73.4% |
| 1994 | 37.1% | 73% |
| 1993 | 37.1% | 72.6% |
| 1992 | 37% | 72.2% |
| 1991 | 36.9% | 71.8% |
| 1990 | 36.8% | 71.4% |
| 1989 | 36.7% | 71% |
| 1988 | 36.5% | 70.5% |
| 1987 | 36.2% | 70% |
| 1986 | 35.9% | 69.5% |
| 1985 | 35.5% | 69% |
| 1984 | 35.2% | 68.4% |
| 1983 | 34.9% | 67.9% |
| 1982 | 34.5% | 67.4% |
| 1981 | 34.2% | 66.9% |
| 1980 | 33.9% | 66.3% |
| 1979 | 33.5% | 65.6% |
| 1978 | 33.2% | 64.9% |
| 1977 | 32.9% | 64.2% |
| 1976 | 32.6% | 63.5% |
| 1975 | 32% | 62.8% |
| 1974 | 31% | 62% |
| 1973 | 30.1% | 61.3% |
| 1972 | 29.2% | 60.5% |
| 1971 | 28.4% | 59.8% |
| 1970 | 27.5% | 59% |
| 1969 | 26.6% | 58.2% |
| 1968 | 25.8% | 57.4% |
| 1967 | 25% | 56.6% |
| 1966 | 24.3% | 55.8% |
| 1965 | 23.5% | 54.9% |
| 1964 | 22.8% | 54.1% |
| 1963 | 22.1% | 53.3% |
| 1962 | 21.4% | 52.4% |
| 1961 | 20.8% | 51.6% |
| 1960 | 20.1% | 50.8% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 38% to 44.1% in the Central African Republic and from 76% to 81.9% in Mexico.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Mexico | 9.21M |
| Tijuana | 1.96M |
| Ecatepec de Morelos | 1.93M |
| Leon | 1.58M |
| Zapopan | 1.48M |
| Guadalajara | 1.46M |
| Puebla | 1.43M |
| Ciudad Juarez | 1.32M |
| Monterrey | 1.14M |
| Ciudad Nezahualcoyotl | 1.07M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons