Latvia is 2.45 times bigger by total area compared to Rwanda: 24,940 sq mi vs 10,169 sq mi. Without inland water, the land area of Latvia is 24,027 sq mi vs 9,525 sq mi for Rwanda — a 2.52 times difference in territory size.
- Latvia ranks 122/197 by total surface area vs 145/197 for Rwanda.
- Latvia occupies 0.04% of the land mass of all countries, compared with 0.02% for Rwanda.
- 31.7% of Latvia's area is agricultural land vs 76.3% in Rwanda.
- Latvia has 0.04% of the world's agricultural land area — Rwanda has 0.04%.
- 55% of Latvia is covered by forests, compared to 11.3% in Rwanda.
- 0.08% of the world's forests are in Latvia, and 0.007% are in Rwanda.
Total size and land area comparison
Latvia
|
Rwanda
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Total area |
24,940 sq mi |
10,169 sq mi |
| Size difference ratio | 2.45 | 1 |
| Total area rank | 122/197 | 145/197 |
| Share of all countries' surface area | 0.01% | 0.005% |
| Land area |
24,027 sq mi |
9,525 sq mi |
| Land area difference ratio | 2.52 | 1 |
| Land area rank | 121/197 | 146/197 |
| Share of all countries' land area | 0.04% | 0.02% |
| Population | 1,866,124 | 14,256,567 |
| Population density | 76.2 ppl/mi² | 1,563 ppl/mi² |
Surface area by type
|
Latvia
|
Rwanda
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Forest area |
13,214 sq mi |
1,077 sq mi |
| Forest area as share of land | 55% | 11.3% |
| Forest area rank | 85/196 | 151/196 |
| World's forests share | 0.08% | 0.007% |
Agricultural land area
|
7,610 sq mi |
7,271 sq mi |
| Agricultural land share | 31.7% | 76.3% |
| Agricultural land area rank | 118/194 | 120/194 |
| Share of global agricultural land | 0.04% | 0.04% |
|
Arable land
|
5,251 sq mi |
4,475 sq mi |
| Arable land share | 21.9% | 47% |
| Arable land area rank | 95/191 | 101/191 |
|
Permanent cropland
|
38.6 sq mi |
1,305 sq mi |
| Permanent cropland share | 0.16% | 13.7% |
| Permanent cropland area rank | 154/192 | 65/192 |
|
Water area
|
913 sq mi |
644 sq mi |
| Water as share of total area | 3.66% | 6.33% |
| Water area rank | 89/197 | 100/197 |
| Roads length | n/a |
2,920 mi |
| Land borders length |
851 mi |
578 mi |
| Coastline length |
309 mi |
0 mi |
| Share of marine protected waters | 16.4% | n/a |
Latvia vs Rwanda size on the map
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (2026, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/size/latvia/rwanda | CC BY
The map above outlines the borders of Latvia and Rwanda but is not accurate for size comparison because it's a 2d map with Mercator projection that distorts territories near the poles. The farther a country is from the equator, the more magnified it appears. More about country size projections.
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (2023–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- Wikidata (2026, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2025, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
Total agricultural land encompasses all areas used for agriculture: territories under permanent and temporary crops and pastures. It includes land under flowering shrubs, fruit and nut trees, and vineyards, but excludes sites utilized for timber production.
Arable land encompasses fields utilized for temporary crop production, pastures, market or kitchen gardens, and temporarily fallowed land. Land abandoned due to shifting cultivation practices is not included.
Permanent cropland refers to farmland for the long-term cultivation of crops, such as coffee, cocoa, and rubber, which do not require replanting after each harvest. This category encompasses land with permanent crops like flowering shrubs, fruit and nut trees, and vines, but does not include land under trees for timber production.
Inland areas under water, such as large rivers, lakes, and some coastal waterways.
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.