Kazakhstan has a population density of 19.8 people per square mile compared to 204.7 people in Tunisia. Kazakhstan has 1,424,328 sq ft of land per person vs 143,444 sq ft in Tunisia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Kazakhstan and Tunisia are ranked 187th and 108th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Kazakhstan has 0.25% of the world's population and 1.81% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.15% of the population and 0.1% of the land area for Tunisia, hence the population density in Kazakhstan is 90.3% lower than in Tunisia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 19.8 ppl/mi² | 204.7 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 187/197 | 108/197 |
| Population |
21036432
|
12402051
|
| Land area | 1,042,360 sq mi | 59,985 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 1,411,156 sq ft | 136,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 41.6% | 29.1% |
| Urban population | 58.4% | 70.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 21.8% | 0% |
Kazakhstan vs Tunisia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Kazakhstan increased by 29.9%, compared to a 20.8% growth in Tunisia.
In 2004, Kazakhstan ranked 181st for population density and is in 187th place now. Tunisia was 105th in 2004 and ranks 108th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 19.8 | 204.7 |
| 2023 | 19.5 | 203.4 |
| 2022 | 19.2 | 202 |
| 2021 | 18.9 | 200.9 |
| 2020 | 18.7 | 199.6 |
| 2019 | 18.4 | 198 |
| 2018 | 18.2 | 196.1 |
| 2017 | 17.9 | 194.2 |
| 2016 | 17.6 | 192.2 |
| 2015 | 17.3 | 190.1 |
| 2014 | 17.1 | 188 |
| 2013 | 16.8 | 185.7 |
| 2012 | 16.6 | 183.5 |
| 2011 | 16.4 | 181.5 |
| 2010 | 16.2 | 179.5 |
| 2009 | 15.9 | 177.6 |
| 2008 | 15.8 | 175.8 |
| 2007 | 15.6 | 174.1 |
| 2006 | 15.4 | 172.5 |
| 2005 | 15.3 | 171 |
| 2004 | 15.2 | 169.5 |
| 2003 | 15.1 | 167.9 |
| 2002 | 15 | 166.2 |
| 2001 | 14.9 | 164.5 |
| 2000 | 14.9 | 162.8 |
| 1999 | 14.8 | 161 |
| 1998 | 15 | 159.1 |
| 1997 | 15.4 | 157.1 |
| 1996 | 15.7 | 154.9 |
| 1995 | 16.1 | 152.7 |
| 1994 | 16.4 | 150.3 |
| 1993 | 16.6 | 147.7 |
| 1992 | 16.6 | 144.7 |
| 1991 | - | 141.7 |
| 1990 | - | 138.8 |
| 1989 | - | 135.9 |
| 1988 | - | 132.9 |
| 1987 | - | 129.9 |
| 1986 | - | 126.7 |
| 1985 | - | 123.5 |
| 1984 | - | 120.4 |
| 1983 | - | 117.6 |
| 1982 | - | 115.2 |
| 1981 | - | 112.7 |
| 1980 | - | 110.1 |
| 1979 | - | 107.6 |
| 1978 | - | 105.2 |
| 1977 | - | 102.6 |
| 1976 | - | 100 |
| 1975 | - | 97.3 |
| 1974 | - | 94.8 |
| 1973 | - | 92.3 |
| 1972 | - | 90 |
| 1971 | - | 87.7 |
| 1970 | - | 85.5 |
| 1969 | - | 83.4 |
| 1968 | - | 81.4 |
| 1967 | - | 79.4 |
| 1966 | - | 77.6 |
| 1965 | - | 76 |
| 1964 | - | 74.9 |
| 1963 | - | 73.8 |
| 1962 | - | 72.8 |
| 1961 | - | 72 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 58.4% | 70.9% |
| 2023 | 58.2% | 70.5% |
| 2022 | 58% | 70.2% |
| 2021 | 57.8% | 69.9% |
| 2020 | 57.7% | 69.6% |
| 2019 | 57.5% | 69.3% |
| 2018 | 57.4% | 68.9% |
| 2017 | 57.3% | 68.6% |
| 2016 | 57.3% | 68.3% |
| 2015 | 57.2% | 68.1% |
| 2014 | 57.1% | 67.8% |
| 2013 | 57% | 67.5% |
| 2012 | 57% | 67.2% |
| 2011 | 56.9% | 66.9% |
| 2010 | 56.8% | 66.7% |
| 2009 | 56.8% | 66.4% |
| 2008 | 56.7% | 66.1% |
| 2007 | 56.6% | 65.8% |
| 2006 | 56.5% | 65.5% |
| 2005 | 56.5% | 65.2% |
| 2004 | 56.4% | 65% |
| 2003 | 56.3% | 64.6% |
| 2002 | 56.2% | 64.2% |
| 2001 | 56.2% | 63.8% |
| 2000 | 56.1% | 63.4% |
| 1999 | 56% | 63% |
| 1998 | 56% | 62.7% |
| 1997 | 56% | 62.3% |
| 1996 | 55.9% | 61.9% |
| 1995 | 55.9% | 61.5% |
| 1994 | 55.9% | 61.1% |
| 1993 | 56% | 60.4% |
| 1992 | 56.1% | 59.6% |
| 1991 | 56.2% | 58.8% |
| 1990 | 56.3% | 57.9% |
| 1989 | 56.4% | 57.1% |
| 1988 | 56.3% | 56.3% |
| 1987 | 56.2% | 55.5% |
| 1986 | 56.1% | 54.7% |
| 1985 | 56% | 53.8% |
| 1984 | 55.9% | 53% |
| 1983 | 55.5% | 52.4% |
| 1982 | 55% | 51.8% |
| 1981 | 54.6% | 51.2% |
| 1980 | 54.1% | 50.6% |
| 1979 | 53.7% | 50% |
| 1978 | 53.4% | 49.4% |
| 1977 | 53.1% | 48.8% |
| 1976 | 52.8% | 48.2% |
| 1975 | 52.6% | 47.6% |
| 1974 | 52.3% | 46.8% |
| 1973 | 51.8% | 46% |
| 1972 | 51.3% | 45.1% |
| 1971 | 50.8% | 44.3% |
| 1970 | 50.2% | 43.5% |
| 1969 | 49.6% | 42.7% |
| 1968 | 49% | 41.8% |
| 1967 | 48.3% | 41% |
| 1966 | 47.7% | 40.2% |
| 1965 | 47% | 39.7% |
| 1964 | 46.4% | 39.3% |
| 1963 | 45.8% | 38.8% |
| 1962 | 45.3% | 38.4% |
| 1961 | 44.7% | 38% |
| 1960 | 44.2% | 37.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 56.4% to 58.4% in Kazakhstan and from 65% to 70.9% in Tunisia.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons