Jamaica has a population density of 679 people per square mile compared to 19.8 people in Kazakhstan. Jamaica has 41,673 sq ft of land per person vs 1,424,328 sq ft in Kazakhstan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Jamaica and Kazakhstan are ranked 41st and 187th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Jamaica has 0.03% of the world's population and 0.007% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.25% of the population and 1.81% of the land area for Kazakhstan, hence the population density in Jamaica is 3,337% higher than in Kazakhstan.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 679 ppl/mi² | 19.8 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 41/197 | 187/197 |
| Population |
2837071
|
21036432
|
| Land area | 4,181 sq mi | 1,042,360 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 41,059 sq ft | 1,411,156 sq ft |
| Rural population | 42.2% | 41.6% |
| Urban population | 57.8% | 58.4% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 21.8% |
Jamaica vs Kazakhstan:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Jamaica increased by 6.25%, compared to a 29.9% growth in Kazakhstan.
In 2004, Jamaica ranked 36th for population density and is in 41st place now. Kazakhstan was 181st in 2004 and ranks 187th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 679 | 19.8 |
| 2023 | 679 | 19.5 |
| 2022 | 679 | 19.2 |
| 2021 | 679 | 18.9 |
| 2020 | 677 | 18.7 |
| 2019 | 675 | 18.4 |
| 2018 | 674 | 18.2 |
| 2017 | 673 | 17.9 |
| 2016 | 672 | 17.6 |
| 2015 | 670 | 17.3 |
| 2014 | 668 | 17.1 |
| 2013 | 666 | 16.8 |
| 2012 | 663 | 16.6 |
| 2011 | 660 | 16.4 |
| 2010 | 657 | 16.2 |
| 2009 | 655 | 15.9 |
| 2008 | 652 | 15.8 |
| 2007 | 649 | 15.6 |
| 2006 | 646 | 15.4 |
| 2005 | 643 | 15.3 |
| 2004 | 639 | 15.2 |
| 2003 | 635 | 15.1 |
| 2002 | 631 | 15 |
| 2001 | 628 | 14.9 |
| 2000 | 624 | 14.9 |
| 1999 | 619 | 14.8 |
| 1998 | 615 | 15 |
| 1997 | 609 | 15.4 |
| 1996 | 604 | 15.7 |
| 1995 | 598 | 16.1 |
| 1994 | 592 | 16.4 |
| 1993 | 586 | 16.6 |
| 1992 | 580 | 16.6 |
| 1991 | 574 | - |
| 1990 | 569 | - |
| 1989 | 565 | - |
| 1988 | 561 | - |
| 1987 | 557 | - |
| 1986 | 553 | - |
| 1985 | 548 | - |
| 1984 | 542 | - |
| 1983 | 534 | - |
| 1982 | 527 | - |
| 1981 | 520 | - |
| 1980 | 513 | - |
| 1979 | 507 | - |
| 1978 | 501 | - |
| 1977 | 495 | - |
| 1976 | 489 | - |
| 1975 | 483 | - |
| 1974 | 476 | - |
| 1973 | 469 | - |
| 1972 | 462 | - |
| 1971 | 455 | - |
| 1970 | 449 | - |
| 1969 | 444 | - |
| 1968 | 439 | - |
| 1967 | 434 | - |
| 1966 | 428 | - |
| 1965 | 423 | - |
| 1964 | 417 | - |
| 1963 | 412 | - |
| 1962 | 406 | - |
| 1961 | 400 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 57.8% | 58.4% |
| 2023 | 57.4% | 58.2% |
| 2022 | 57% | 58% |
| 2021 | 56.7% | 57.8% |
| 2020 | 56.3% | 57.7% |
| 2019 | 56% | 57.5% |
| 2018 | 55.7% | 57.4% |
| 2017 | 55.4% | 57.3% |
| 2016 | 55.1% | 57.3% |
| 2015 | 54.8% | 57.2% |
| 2014 | 54.6% | 57.1% |
| 2013 | 54.4% | 57% |
| 2012 | 54.1% | 57% |
| 2011 | 53.9% | 56.9% |
| 2010 | 53.7% | 56.8% |
| 2009 | 53.6% | 56.8% |
| 2008 | 53.4% | 56.7% |
| 2007 | 53.2% | 56.6% |
| 2006 | 53% | 56.5% |
| 2005 | 52.8% | 56.5% |
| 2004 | 52.6% | 56.4% |
| 2003 | 52.4% | 56.3% |
| 2002 | 52.3% | 56.2% |
| 2001 | 52.1% | 56.2% |
| 2000 | 51.8% | 56.1% |
| 1999 | 51.6% | 56% |
| 1998 | 51.3% | 56% |
| 1997 | 51.1% | 56% |
| 1996 | 50.9% | 55.9% |
| 1995 | 50.6% | 55.9% |
| 1994 | 50.4% | 55.9% |
| 1993 | 50.1% | 56% |
| 1992 | 49.9% | 56.1% |
| 1991 | 49.7% | 56.2% |
| 1990 | 49.4% | 56.3% |
| 1989 | 49.2% | 56.4% |
| 1988 | 49% | 56.3% |
| 1987 | 48.8% | 56.2% |
| 1986 | 48.6% | 56.1% |
| 1985 | 48.4% | 56% |
| 1984 | 48.2% | 55.9% |
| 1983 | 48% | 55.5% |
| 1982 | 47.8% | 55% |
| 1981 | 47.3% | 54.6% |
| 1980 | 46.7% | 54.1% |
| 1979 | 46.2% | 53.7% |
| 1978 | 45.6% | 53.4% |
| 1977 | 45.1% | 53.1% |
| 1976 | 44.6% | 52.8% |
| 1975 | 44% | 52.6% |
| 1974 | 43.5% | 52.3% |
| 1973 | 42.9% | 51.8% |
| 1972 | 42.4% | 51.3% |
| 1971 | 41.9% | 50.8% |
| 1970 | 41.3% | 50.2% |
| 1969 | 40.6% | 49.6% |
| 1968 | 39.8% | 49% |
| 1967 | 39% | 48.3% |
| 1966 | 38.3% | 47.7% |
| 1965 | 37.5% | 47% |
| 1964 | 36.7% | 46.4% |
| 1963 | 36% | 45.8% |
| 1962 | 35.2% | 45.3% |
| 1961 | 34.5% | 44.7% |
| 1960 | 33.8% | 44.2% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 52.6% to 57.8% in Jamaica and from 56.4% to 58.4% in Kazakhstan.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Kingston | 580K |
| Spanish Town | 131K |
| Montego Bay | 124K |
| Half Way Tree | 96.5K |
| May Pen | 61.5K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons