Croatia has a population density of 178.9 people per square mile compared to 792 people in El Salvador. Croatia has 157,560 sq ft of land per person vs 35,733 sq ft in El Salvador. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Croatia and El Salvador are ranked 121st and 33rd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Croatia has 0.05% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.08% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for El Salvador, hence the population density in Croatia is 77.4% lower than in El Salvador.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 178.9 ppl/mi² | 792 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 121/197 | 33/197 |
| Population |
3839202
|
6386184
|
| Land area | 21,606 sq mi | 8,000 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 155,795 sq ft | 35,188 sq ft |
| Rural population | 41.1% | 24% |
| Urban population | 58.9% | 76% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Croatia vs El Salvador:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Croatia decreased by 10.2%, compared to a 5.55% growth in El Salvador.
In 2004, Croatia ranked 92nd for population density and is in 121st place now. El Salvador was 27th in 2004 and ranks 33rd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 178.9 | 792 |
| 2023 | 178.6 | 789 |
| 2022 | 178.5 | 785 |
| 2021 | 179.5 | 782 |
| 2020 | 181.2 | 779 |
| 2019 | 182.8 | 778 |
| 2018 | 184.6 | 777 |
| 2017 | 187 | 777 |
| 2016 | 190.1 | 775 |
| 2015 | 192.1 | 773 |
| 2014 | 194.4 | 770 |
| 2013 | 195.9 | 767 |
| 2012 | 197.2 | 764 |
| 2011 | 198.1 | 761 |
| 2010 | 198.8 | 759 |
| 2009 | 199.2 | 756 |
| 2008 | 199.5 | 754 |
| 2007 | 199.5 | 751 |
| 2006 | 199.5 | 750 |
| 2005 | 199.5 | 751 |
| 2004 | 199.2 | 751 |
| 2003 | 199.2 | 750 |
| 2002 | 199.3 | 748 |
| 2001 | 199.2 | 746 |
| 2000 | 207 | 743 |
| 1999 | 209 | 739 |
| 1998 | 209.9 | 735 |
| 1997 | 209.8 | 731 |
| 1996 | 210.8 | 726 |
| 1995 | 214 | 720 |
| 1994 | 215.5 | 714 |
| 1993 | 213.1 | 707 |
| 1992 | 212 | 698 |
| 1991 | - | 687 |
| 1990 | - | 675 |
| 1989 | - | 662 |
| 1988 | - | 649 |
| 1987 | - | 637 |
| 1986 | - | 624 |
| 1985 | - | 612 |
| 1984 | - | 600 |
| 1983 | - | 588 |
| 1982 | - | 578 |
| 1981 | - | 571 |
| 1980 | - | 568 |
| 1979 | - | 560 |
| 1978 | - | 549 |
| 1977 | - | 538 |
| 1976 | - | 526 |
| 1975 | - | 512 |
| 1974 | - | 501 |
| 1973 | - | 489 |
| 1972 | - | 478 |
| 1971 | - | 467 |
| 1970 | - | 456 |
| 1969 | - | 444 |
| 1968 | - | 432 |
| 1967 | - | 421 |
| 1966 | - | 409 |
| 1965 | - | 397 |
| 1964 | - | 387 |
| 1963 | - | 376 |
| 1962 | - | 366 |
| 1961 | - | 357 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 58.9% | 76% |
| 2023 | 58.6% | 75.4% |
| 2022 | 58.2% | 74.8% |
| 2021 | 57.9% | 74.1% |
| 2020 | 57.6% | 73.4% |
| 2019 | 57.2% | 72.7% |
| 2018 | 56.9% | 72% |
| 2017 | 56.7% | 71.3% |
| 2016 | 56.4% | 70.5% |
| 2015 | 56.2% | 69.7% |
| 2014 | 55.9% | 68.9% |
| 2013 | 55.7% | 68% |
| 2012 | 55.5% | 67.2% |
| 2011 | 55.3% | 66.3% |
| 2010 | 55.2% | 65.5% |
| 2009 | 55% | 64.6% |
| 2008 | 54.8% | 63.7% |
| 2007 | 54.7% | 62.8% |
| 2006 | 54.5% | 62.2% |
| 2005 | 54.3% | 61.6% |
| 2004 | 54.1% | 61.1% |
| 2003 | 54% | 60.6% |
| 2002 | 53.8% | 60% |
| 2001 | 53.6% | 59.5% |
| 2000 | 53.4% | 58.9% |
| 1999 | 53.2% | 58.4% |
| 1998 | 53% | 57.8% |
| 1997 | 52.7% | 56.5% |
| 1996 | 52.5% | 55.3% |
| 1995 | 52.3% | 54% |
| 1994 | 52% | 52.7% |
| 1993 | 51.8% | 51.4% |
| 1992 | 51.6% | 50.3% |
| 1991 | 51.4% | 49.8% |
| 1990 | 51% | 49.3% |
| 1989 | 50.7% | 48.8% |
| 1988 | 50.3% | 48.2% |
| 1987 | 50% | 47.7% |
| 1986 | 49.6% | 47.2% |
| 1985 | 49.3% | 46.7% |
| 1984 | 48.9% | 46.2% |
| 1983 | 48.6% | 45.6% |
| 1982 | 48.2% | 45.1% |
| 1981 | 47.9% | 44.6% |
| 1980 | 47.3% | 44.1% |
| 1979 | 46.6% | 43.6% |
| 1978 | 45.9% | 43.1% |
| 1977 | 45.2% | 42.6% |
| 1976 | 44.5% | 42.1% |
| 1975 | 43.9% | 41.6% |
| 1974 | 43.2% | 41% |
| 1973 | 42.5% | 40.5% |
| 1972 | 41.8% | 40% |
| 1971 | 41.2% | 39.5% |
| 1970 | 40.2% | 39.4% |
| 1969 | 39.1% | 39.3% |
| 1968 | 38.1% | 39.2% |
| 1967 | 37% | 39.1% |
| 1966 | 36% | 39% |
| 1965 | 35% | 38.9% |
| 1964 | 34% | 38.8% |
| 1963 | 33% | 38.7% |
| 1962 | 32% | 38.6% |
| 1961 | 31% | 38.5% |
| 1960 | 30.2% | 38.4% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 54.1% to 58.9% in Croatia and from 61.1% to 76% in El Salvador.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Zagreb | 767K |
| Split | 161K |
| Rijeka | 108K |
| Osijek | 96.3K |
| Zadar | 70.8K |
| Velika Gorica | 61.1K |
| Pula | 52.2K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| San Salvador | 331K |
| Santa Ana | 251K |
| San Miguel | 233K |
| Soyapango | 230K |
| Mejicanos | 137K |
| Apopa | 129K |
| Ahuachapan | 127K |
| Santa Tecla | 126K |
| Sonsonate | 72.2K |
| Usulutan | 66.1K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons