Guatemala has a population density of 445 people per square mile compared to 49 people in South Sudan. Guatemala has 63,678 sq ft of land per person vs 580,697 sq ft in South Sudan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Guatemala and South Sudan are ranked 60th and 172nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Guatemala has 0.23% of the world's population and 0.07% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.15% of the population and 0.42% of the land area for South Sudan, hence the population density in Guatemala is 809% higher than in South Sudan.
Population density comparison
Guatemala
|
South Sudan
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 445 ppl/mi² | 49 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 60/197 | 172/197 |
| Population |
18912872
|
12387398
|
| Land area | 41,375 sq mi | 243,990 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 62,666 sq ft | 569,522 sq ft |
| Rural population | 46.5% | 78.4% |
| Urban population | 53.5% | 21.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 6.59% | 0% |
Guatemala vs South Sudan:
Population density chart by year
From 2012 to 2024, population density in Guatemala increased by 22%, compared to a 11% growth in South Sudan.
In 2012, Guatemala ranked 61st for population density and is in 60th place now. South Sudan was 169th in 2012 and ranks 172nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Guatemala
|
South Sudan
|
|
| 2024 | 445 | 49 |
| 2023 | 438 | 47.1 |
| 2022 | 431 | 45.2 |
| 2021 | 425 | 44.5 |
| 2020 | 420 | 43.8 |
| 2019 | 413 | 42.7 |
| 2018 | 407 | 41.5 |
| 2017 | 400 | 42 |
| 2016 | 393 | 44.4 |
| 2015 | 386 | 45.5 |
| 2014 | 379 | 46 |
| 2013 | 372 | 45.8 |
| 2012 | 365 | 44.1 |
| 2011 | 358 | - |
| 2010 | 350 | - |
| 2009 | 344 | - |
| 2008 | 337 | - |
| 2007 | 330 | - |
| 2006 | 323 | - |
| 2005 | 316 | - |
| 2004 | 310 | - |
| 2003 | 303 | - |
| 2002 | 296 | - |
| 2001 | 289.3 | - |
| 2000 | 282.7 | - |
| 1999 | 276.1 | - |
| 1998 | 269.2 | - |
| 1997 | 262.4 | - |
| 1996 | 255.8 | - |
| 1995 | 249.3 | - |
| 1994 | 242.8 | - |
| 1993 | 236.4 | - |
| 1992 | 230.1 | - |
| 1991 | 224.1 | - |
| 1990 | 218.1 | - |
| 1989 | 212.1 | - |
| 1988 | 206.2 | - |
| 1987 | 200.5 | - |
| 1986 | 195.1 | - |
| 1985 | 189.7 | - |
| 1984 | 184.4 | - |
| 1983 | 179.3 | - |
| 1982 | 175 | - |
| 1981 | 171 | - |
| 1980 | 166.8 | - |
| 1979 | 162.6 | - |
| 1978 | 158.6 | - |
| 1977 | 154.7 | - |
| 1976 | 151.4 | - |
| 1975 | 148.1 | - |
| 1974 | 144.6 | - |
| 1973 | 140.9 | - |
| 1972 | 137.4 | - |
| 1971 | 133.9 | - |
| 1970 | 130.4 | - |
| 1969 | 127.1 | - |
| 1968 | 123.7 | - |
| 1967 | 120.3 | - |
| 1966 | 117 | - |
| 1965 | 113.7 | - |
| 1964 | 110.5 | - |
| 1963 | 107.3 | - |
| 1962 | 104.2 | - |
| 1961 | 101.2 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Guatemala
|
South Sudan
|
|
| 2024 | 53.5% | 21.6% |
| 2023 | 53.1% | 21.2% |
| 2022 | 52.7% | 20.8% |
| 2021 | 52.2% | 20.5% |
| 2020 | 51.8% | 20.2% |
| 2019 | 51.4% | 19.9% |
| 2018 | 51.1% | 19.6% |
| 2017 | 50.7% | 19.3% |
| 2016 | 50.3% | 19.1% |
| 2015 | 50% | 18.9% |
| 2014 | 49.6% | 18.6% |
| 2013 | 49.3% | 18.4% |
| 2012 | 49% | 18.2% |
| 2011 | 48.7% | 18% |
| 2010 | 48.4% | 17.9% |
| 2009 | 48.1% | 17.7% |
| 2008 | 47.8% | 17.6% |
| 2007 | 47.5% | 17.4% |
| 2006 | 47.2% | 17.3% |
| 2005 | 46.9% | 17.2% |
| 2004 | 46.6% | 17% |
| 2003 | 46.3% | 16.9% |
| 2002 | 46% | 16.8% |
| 2001 | 45.7% | 16.6% |
| 2000 | 45.3% | 16.5% |
| 1999 | 45% | 16.4% |
| 1998 | 44.7% | 16.2% |
| 1997 | 44.3% | 16.1% |
| 1996 | 44% | 16% |
| 1995 | 43.7% | 15.9% |
| 1994 | 43.3% | 15.7% |
| 1993 | 43% | 15.6% |
| 1992 | 42.7% | 14.9% |
| 1991 | 42.3% | 14.1% |
| 1990 | 42% | 13.3% |
| 1989 | 41.7% | 12.5% |
| 1988 | 41.3% | 11.8% |
| 1987 | 41% | 11.1% |
| 1986 | 40.7% | 10.5% |
| 1985 | 40.3% | 9.84% |
| 1984 | 40% | 9.26% |
| 1983 | 39.7% | 8.71% |
| 1982 | 39.4% | 8.5% |
| 1981 | 39% | 8.51% |
| 1980 | 38.7% | 8.52% |
| 1979 | 38.4% | 8.53% |
| 1978 | 38.1% | 8.54% |
| 1977 | 37.8% | 8.55% |
| 1976 | 37.4% | 8.57% |
| 1975 | 37.1% | 8.58% |
| 1974 | 36.8% | 8.59% |
| 1973 | 36.5% | 8.6% |
| 1972 | 36.2% | 8.61% |
| 1971 | 35.9% | 8.62% |
| 1970 | 35.5% | 8.63% |
| 1969 | 35.2% | 8.64% |
| 1968 | 34.9% | 8.66% |
| 1967 | 34.6% | 8.67% |
| 1966 | 34.3% | 8.68% |
| 1965 | 34% | 8.69% |
| 1964 | 33.7% | 8.7% |
| 1963 | 33.1% | 8.71% |
| 1962 | 32.4% | 8.73% |
| 1961 | 31.8% | 8.74% |
| 1960 | 31.1% | 8.75% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 46.6% to 53.5% in Guatemala and from 17% to 21.6% in South Sudan.
Densely populated cities
|
Guatemala
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Guatemala | 1.21M |
| Mixco | 528K |
| Coban | 229K |
| Quetzaltenango | 208K |
| Jalapa | 193K |
| San Miguel Petapa | 151K |
| Momostenango | 140K |
| Mazatenango | 83.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
