Guatemala has a population density of 459 people per square mile compared to 4,620 people in Maldives. Guatemala has 63,678 sq ft of land per person vs 6,077 sq ft in Maldives. Guatemala and Maldives rank 60th and 6th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Guatemala has 0.23% of the world's population and 0.07% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.006% of the population and 0.0002% of the land area for Maldives, making the population density in Guatemala 90.1% lower than in Maldives.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Guatemala
|
Maldives
|
|
| 2026 | 459 | 4,620 |
| 2025 | 452 | 4,604 |
| 2024 | 445 | 4,587 |
| 2023 | 438 | 4,572 |
| 2022 | 431 | 4,525 |
| 2021 | 425 | 4,456 |
| 2020 | 420 | 4,335 |
| 2019 | 413 | 4,211 |
| 2018 | 407 | 4,084 |
| 2017 | 400 | 3,957 |
| 2016 | 393 | 3,827 |
| 2015 | 386 | 3,696 |
| 2014 | 379 | 3,571 |
| 2013 | 372 | 3,454 |
| 2012 | 365 | 3,340 |
| 2011 | 358 | 3,226 |
| 2010 | 350 | 3,115 |
| 2009 | 344 | 3,007 |
| 2008 | 337 | 2,902 |
| 2007 | 330 | 2,801 |
| 2006 | 323 | 2,710 |
| 2005 | 316 | 2,645 |
| 2004 | 310 | 2,602 |
| 2003 | 303 | 2,560 |
| 2002 | 296 | 2,518 |
| 2001 | 289.3 | 2,476 |
| 2000 | 282.7 | 2,435 |
| 1999 | 276.1 | 2,395 |
| 1998 | 269.2 | 2,354 |
| 1997 | 262.4 | 2,311 |
| 1996 | 255.8 | 2,265 |
| 1995 | 249.3 | 2,216 |
| 1994 | 242.8 | 2,165 |
| 1993 | 236.4 | 2,114 |
| 1992 | 230.1 | 2,059 |
| 1991 | 224.1 | 2,001 |
| 1990 | 218.1 | 1,940 |
| 1989 | 212.1 | 1,880 |
| 1988 | 206.2 | 1,821 |
| 1987 | 200.5 | 1,761 |
| 1986 | 195.1 | 1,700 |
| 1985 | 189.7 | 1,642 |
| 1984 | 184.4 | 1,590 |
| 1983 | 179.3 | 1,546 |
| 1982 | 175 | 1,505 |
| 1981 | 171 | 1,464 |
| 1980 | 166.8 | 1,423 |
| 1979 | 162.6 | 1,384 |
| 1978 | 158.6 | 1,348 |
| 1977 | 154.7 | 1,312 |
| 1976 | 151.4 | 1,274 |
| 1975 | 148.1 | 1,236 |
| 1974 | 144.6 | 1,200 |
| 1973 | 140.9 | 1,165 |
| 1972 | 137.4 | 1,131 |
| 1971 | 133.9 | 1,097 |
| 1970 | 130.4 | 1,064 |
| 1969 | 127.1 | 1,032 |
| 1968 | 123.7 | 1,002 |
| 1967 | 120.3 | 971 |
| 1966 | 117 | 937 |
| 1965 | 113.7 | 899 |
| 1964 | 110.5 | 869 |
| 1963 | 107.3 | 848 |
| 1962 | 104.2 | 827 |
| 1961 | 101.2 | 807 |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/guatemala/maldives | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Guatemala increased by 41.9%, compared to a 70.5% growth in Maldives.
In 2006, Guatemala ranked 62nd by population density and is 60th now. Maldives was 7th in 2006 and ranks 6th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Guatemala
|
Maldives
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 459 ppl/mi² | 4,620 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 60/197 | 6/197 |
| Population |
19049936
|
532057
|
| Land area | 41,375 sq mi | 115.1 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 62,666 sq ft | 6,077 sq ft |
| Rural population | 44% | 58% |
| Urban population | 56% | 42% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Guatemala
|
Maldives
|
|
| 2024 | 56% | 42% |
| 2023 | 55.6% | 41.5% |
| 2022 | 55.3% | 41.1% |
| 2021 | 54.9% | 40.7% |
| 2020 | 54.5% | 40.4% |
| 2019 | 54.2% | 40% |
| 2018 | 53.8% | 39.7% |
| 2017 | 53.8% | 39.3% |
| 2016 | 53.7% | 39% |
| 2015 | 53.4% | 38.6% |
| 2014 | 53.1% | 38.2% |
| 2013 | 52.8% | 37.8% |
| 2012 | 52.4% | 37.5% |
| 2011 | 51.9% | 37.1% |
| 2010 | 51.3% | 36.8% |
| 2009 | 50.7% | 36.4% |
| 2008 | 50.1% | 35.9% |
| 2007 | 49.5% | 35.4% |
| 2006 | 48.8% | 34.9% |
| 2005 | 48.1% | 34.1% |
| 2004 | 47.3% | 32.9% |
| 2003 | 46.6% | 31.4% |
| 2002 | 45.8% | 29.9% |
| 2001 | 44.7% | 28.6% |
| 2000 | 43.2% | 27.6% |
| 1999 | 41.6% | 27% |
| 1998 | 39.9% | 26.5% |
| 1997 | 38.3% | 26% |
| 1996 | 36.9% | 25.7% |
| 1995 | 35.8% | 25.5% |
| 1994 | 35.1% | 25.6% |
| 1993 | 34.7% | 25.6% |
| 1992 | 34.4% | 25.7% |
| 1991 | 34.2% | 25.8% |
| 1990 | 33.9% | 25.9% |
| 1989 | 33.7% | 25.8% |
| 1988 | 33.5% | 25.8% |
| 1987 | 33.3% | 25.7% |
| 1986 | 33.1% | 25.6% |
| 1985 | 33% | 25.5% |
| 1984 | 32.9% | 25.3% |
| 1983 | 32.8% | 24.9% |
| 1982 | 32.7% | 24.3% |
| 1981 | 32.7% | 23.6% |
| 1980 | 32.8% | 22.8% |
| 1979 | 33.2% | 22% |
| 1978 | 33.7% | 21.1% |
| 1977 | 34.4% | 20.2% |
| 1976 | 35.1% | 19% |
| 1975 | 35.7% | 17.6% |
| 1974 | 36.2% | 16.2% |
| 1973 | 36.4% | 14.7% |
| 1972 | 36.4% | 13.5% |
| 1971 | 36.2% | 12.5% |
| 1970 | 36% | 11.9% |
| 1969 | 35.7% | 11.6% |
| 1968 | 35.4% | 11.4% |
| 1967 | 35% | 11.3% |
| 1966 | 34.5% | 11.4% |
| 1965 | 34.1% | 11.5% |
| 1964 | 33.7% | 11.5% |
| 1963 | 33.3% | 11.4% |
| 1962 | 32.8% | 11.4% |
| 1961 | 32.4% | 11.4% |
| 1960 | 31.8% | 11.4% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/guatemala/maldives | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 47.3% to 56% in Guatemala and from 32.9% to 42% in Maldives.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/guatemala/maldives | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2014–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.