Malta has a population density of 4,649 people per square mile compared to 200.5 people in Tanzania. Malta has 5,922 sq ft of land per person vs 148,726 sq ft in Tanzania. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Malta and Tanzania are ranked 5th and 113th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Malta has 0.007% of the world's population and 0.0002% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.84% of the population and 0.59% of the land area for Tanzania, hence the population density in Malta is 2,219% higher than in Tanzania.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 4,649 ppl/mi² | 200.5 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 5/197 | 113/197 |
| Population |
583596
|
72166806
|
| Land area | 123.6 sq mi | 342,009 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 5,997 sq ft | 139,070 sq ft |
| Rural population | 4.99% | 61.9% |
| Urban population | 95% | 38.1% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 6.88% |
Malta vs Tanzania:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Malta increased by 43.1%, compared to a 79.9% growth in Tanzania.
In 2004, Malta ranked 4th for population density and is in 5th place now. Tanzania was 130th in 2004 and ranks 113th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 4,649 | 200.5 |
| 2023 | 4,474 | 194.8 |
| 2022 | 4,299 | 189.2 |
| 2021 | 4,194 | 183.7 |
| 2020 | 4,172 | 178.3 |
| 2019 | 4,079 | 173 |
| 2018 | 3,917 | 167.9 |
| 2017 | 3,781 | 162.7 |
| 2016 | 3,679 | 157.4 |
| 2015 | 3,595 | 152.1 |
| 2014 | 3,508 | 147.2 |
| 2013 | 3,438 | 142.8 |
| 2012 | 3,400 | 138.5 |
| 2011 | 3,369 | 134.6 |
| 2010 | 3,355 | 130.9 |
| 2009 | 3,338 | 127.6 |
| 2008 | 3,313 | 124.5 |
| 2007 | 3,292 | 121.2 |
| 2006 | 3,280 | 117.8 |
| 2005 | 3,269 | 114.6 |
| 2004 | 3,248 | 111.4 |
| 2003 | 3,226 | 108.4 |
| 2002 | 3,205 | 105.6 |
| 2001 | 3,181 | 102.9 |
| 2000 | 3,157 | 100.2 |
| 1999 | 3,137 | 97.4 |
| 1998 | 3,118 | 94.8 |
| 1997 | 3,098 | 92.3 |
| 1996 | 3,075 | 90.5 |
| 1995 | 3,055 | 88.8 |
| 1994 | 3,033 | 86.1 |
| 1993 | 3,005 | 82.8 |
| 1992 | 2,975 | 80.3 |
| 1991 | 2,945 | 78.3 |
| 1990 | 2,867 | 76.3 |
| 1989 | 2,839 | 74.4 |
| 1988 | 2,811 | 72.4 |
| 1987 | 2,788 | 70.3 |
| 1986 | 2,769 | 68 |
| 1985 | 2,723 | 65.8 |
| 1984 | 2,676 | 63.7 |
| 1983 | 2,675 | 61.6 |
| 1982 | 2,638 | 59.6 |
| 1981 | 2,582 | 57.8 |
| 1980 | 2,563 | 56.1 |
| 1979 | 2,536 | 54.4 |
| 1978 | 2,511 | 52.6 |
| 1977 | 2,485 | 50.7 |
| 1976 | 2,475 | 48.9 |
| 1975 | 2,462 | 47.2 |
| 1974 | 2,444 | 45.5 |
| 1973 | 2,446 | 43.9 |
| 1972 | 2,448 | 42.3 |
| 1971 | 2,450 | 40.9 |
| 1970 | 2,450 | 39.5 |
| 1969 | 2,463 | 38.1 |
| 1968 | 2,492 | 36.8 |
| 1967 | 2,522 | 35.7 |
| 1966 | 2,551 | 34.6 |
| 1965 | 2,580 | 33.5 |
| 1964 | 2,600 | 32.5 |
| 1963 | 2,611 | 31.6 |
| 1962 | 2,622 | 30.7 |
| 1961 | 2,632 | 29.8 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 95% | 38.1% |
| 2023 | 94.9% | 37.4% |
| 2022 | 94.9% | 36.7% |
| 2021 | 94.8% | 36% |
| 2020 | 94.7% | 35.2% |
| 2019 | 94.7% | 34.5% |
| 2018 | 94.6% | 33.8% |
| 2017 | 94.5% | 33.1% |
| 2016 | 94.5% | 32.3% |
| 2015 | 94.4% | 31.6% |
| 2014 | 94.3% | 30.9% |
| 2013 | 94.3% | 30.2% |
| 2012 | 94.2% | 29.5% |
| 2011 | 94.1% | 28.8% |
| 2010 | 94.1% | 28.1% |
| 2009 | 94% | 27.4% |
| 2008 | 93.9% | 26.8% |
| 2007 | 93.9% | 26.1% |
| 2006 | 93.8% | 25.5% |
| 2005 | 93.6% | 24.8% |
| 2004 | 93.4% | 24.2% |
| 2003 | 93.2% | 23.6% |
| 2002 | 92.9% | 23% |
| 2001 | 92.6% | 22.7% |
| 2000 | 92.4% | 22.3% |
| 1999 | 92.1% | 21.9% |
| 1998 | 91.8% | 21.6% |
| 1997 | 91.5% | 21.2% |
| 1996 | 91.2% | 20.9% |
| 1995 | 90.9% | 20.5% |
| 1994 | 90.8% | 20.2% |
| 1993 | 90.7% | 19.9% |
| 1992 | 90.6% | 19.5% |
| 1991 | 90.5% | 19.2% |
| 1990 | 90.4% | 18.9% |
| 1989 | 90.3% | 18.6% |
| 1988 | 90.1% | 18.2% |
| 1987 | 90% | 17.7% |
| 1986 | 89.9% | 17.2% |
| 1985 | 89.8% | 16.8% |
| 1984 | 89.8% | 16.3% |
| 1983 | 89.8% | 15.9% |
| 1982 | 89.8% | 15.4% |
| 1981 | 89.8% | 15% |
| 1980 | 89.8% | 14.6% |
| 1979 | 89.8% | 14.1% |
| 1978 | 89.8% | 13.7% |
| 1977 | 89.8% | 12.8% |
| 1976 | 89.8% | 11.9% |
| 1975 | 89.7% | 11.1% |
| 1974 | 89.7% | 10.4% |
| 1973 | 89.7% | 9.7% |
| 1972 | 89.7% | 9.05% |
| 1971 | 89.7% | 8.43% |
| 1970 | 89.7% | 7.85% |
| 1969 | 89.7% | 7.31% |
| 1968 | 89.7% | 6.8% |
| 1967 | 89.7% | 6.37% |
| 1966 | 89.8% | 6.2% |
| 1965 | 89.8% | 6.03% |
| 1964 | 89.9% | 5.87% |
| 1963 | 89.9% | 5.7% |
| 1962 | 90% | 5.55% |
| 1961 | 90.1% | 5.39% |
| 1960 | 90.1% | 5.25% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 93.4% to 95% in Malta and from 24.2% to 38.1% in Tanzania.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons