Russia has a population density of 22.7 people per square mile compared to 204.7 people in Tunisia. Russia has 1,280,521 sq ft of land per person vs 143,444 sq ft in Tunisia. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Russia and Tunisia are ranked 185th and 108th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Russia has 1.76% of the world's population and 11% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.15% of the population and 0.1% of the land area for Tunisia, hence the population density in Russia is 88.9% lower than in Tunisia.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 22.7 ppl/mi² | 204.7 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 185/197 | 108/197 |
| Population |
142718132
|
12402051
|
| Land area | 6,323,145 sq mi | 59,985 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 1,228,137 sq ft | 136,211 sq ft |
| Rural population | 24.5% | 29.1% |
| Urban population | 75.5% | 70.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 24.8% | 0% |
Russia vs Tunisia:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Russia decreased by 0.34%, compared to a 20.8% growth in Tunisia.
In 2004, Russia ranked 176th for population density and is in 185th place now. Tunisia was 105th in 2004 and ranks 108th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 22.7 | 204.7 |
| 2023 | 22.7 | 203.4 |
| 2022 | 22.8 | 202 |
| 2021 | 22.9 | 200.9 |
| 2020 | 23 | 199.6 |
| 2019 | 23 | 198 |
| 2018 | 23 | 196.1 |
| 2017 | 23 | 194.2 |
| 2016 | 22.9 | 192.2 |
| 2015 | 22.9 | 190.1 |
| 2014 | 22.8 | 188 |
| 2013 | 22.7 | 185.7 |
| 2012 | 22.7 | 183.5 |
| 2011 | 22.6 | 181.5 |
| 2010 | 22.6 | 179.5 |
| 2009 | 22.6 | 177.6 |
| 2008 | 22.6 | 175.8 |
| 2007 | 22.6 | 174.1 |
| 2006 | 22.6 | 172.5 |
| 2005 | 22.7 | 171 |
| 2004 | 22.8 | 169.5 |
| 2003 | 22.9 | 167.9 |
| 2002 | 23 | 166.2 |
| 2001 | 23.1 | 164.5 |
| 2000 | 23.2 | 162.8 |
| 1999 | 23.3 | 161 |
| 1998 | 23.3 | 159.1 |
| 1997 | 23.4 | 157.1 |
| 1996 | 23.4 | 154.9 |
| 1995 | 23.5 | 152.7 |
| 1994 | 23.5 | 150.3 |
| 1993 | 23.5 | 147.7 |
| 1992 | 23.5 | 144.7 |
| 1991 | - | 141.7 |
| 1990 | - | 138.8 |
| 1989 | - | 135.9 |
| 1988 | - | 132.9 |
| 1987 | - | 129.9 |
| 1986 | - | 126.7 |
| 1985 | - | 123.5 |
| 1984 | - | 120.4 |
| 1983 | - | 117.6 |
| 1982 | - | 115.2 |
| 1981 | - | 112.7 |
| 1980 | - | 110.1 |
| 1979 | - | 107.6 |
| 1978 | - | 105.2 |
| 1977 | - | 102.6 |
| 1976 | - | 100 |
| 1975 | - | 97.3 |
| 1974 | - | 94.8 |
| 1973 | - | 92.3 |
| 1972 | - | 90 |
| 1971 | - | 87.7 |
| 1970 | - | 85.5 |
| 1969 | - | 83.4 |
| 1968 | - | 81.4 |
| 1967 | - | 79.4 |
| 1966 | - | 77.6 |
| 1965 | - | 76 |
| 1964 | - | 74.9 |
| 1963 | - | 73.8 |
| 1962 | - | 72.8 |
| 1961 | - | 72 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 75.5% | 70.9% |
| 2023 | 75.3% | 70.5% |
| 2022 | 75.1% | 70.2% |
| 2021 | 74.9% | 69.9% |
| 2020 | 74.8% | 69.6% |
| 2019 | 74.6% | 69.3% |
| 2018 | 74.4% | 68.9% |
| 2017 | 74.3% | 68.6% |
| 2016 | 74.2% | 68.3% |
| 2015 | 74% | 68.1% |
| 2014 | 73.9% | 67.8% |
| 2013 | 73.9% | 67.5% |
| 2012 | 73.8% | 67.2% |
| 2011 | 73.7% | 66.9% |
| 2010 | 73.7% | 66.7% |
| 2009 | 73.6% | 66.4% |
| 2008 | 73.6% | 66.1% |
| 2007 | 73.6% | 65.8% |
| 2006 | 73.5% | 65.5% |
| 2005 | 73.5% | 65.2% |
| 2004 | 73.4% | 65% |
| 2003 | 73.4% | 64.6% |
| 2002 | 73.3% | 64.2% |
| 2001 | 73.3% | 63.8% |
| 2000 | 73.3% | 63.4% |
| 1999 | 73.4% | 63% |
| 1998 | 73.4% | 62.7% |
| 1997 | 73.4% | 62.3% |
| 1996 | 73.4% | 61.9% |
| 1995 | 73.4% | 61.5% |
| 1994 | 73.4% | 61.1% |
| 1993 | 73.4% | 60.4% |
| 1992 | 73.4% | 59.6% |
| 1991 | 73.4% | 58.8% |
| 1990 | 73.4% | 57.9% |
| 1989 | 73.4% | 57.1% |
| 1988 | 73.2% | 56.3% |
| 1987 | 72.8% | 55.5% |
| 1986 | 72.3% | 54.7% |
| 1985 | 71.9% | 53.8% |
| 1984 | 71.5% | 53% |
| 1983 | 71.1% | 52.4% |
| 1982 | 70.6% | 51.8% |
| 1981 | 70.2% | 51.2% |
| 1980 | 69.8% | 50.6% |
| 1979 | 69.3% | 50% |
| 1978 | 68.7% | 49.4% |
| 1977 | 68% | 48.8% |
| 1976 | 67.2% | 48.2% |
| 1975 | 66.4% | 47.6% |
| 1974 | 65.7% | 46.8% |
| 1973 | 64.9% | 46% |
| 1972 | 64.1% | 45.1% |
| 1971 | 63.3% | 44.3% |
| 1970 | 62.5% | 43.5% |
| 1969 | 61.6% | 42.7% |
| 1968 | 60.8% | 41.8% |
| 1967 | 59.9% | 41% |
| 1966 | 59% | 40.2% |
| 1965 | 58.2% | 39.7% |
| 1964 | 57.3% | 39.3% |
| 1963 | 56.4% | 38.8% |
| 1962 | 55.5% | 38.4% |
| 1961 | 54.6% | 38% |
| 1960 | 53.7% | 37.5% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 73.4% to 75.5% in Russia and from 65% to 70.9% in Tunisia.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Moscow | 13.3M |
| Saint Petersburg | 5.65M |
| Novosibirsk | 1.64M |
| Yekaterinburg | 1.47M |
| Kazan | 1.33M |
| Nizhny Novgorod | 1.2M |
| Chelyabinsk | 1.18M |
| Krasnodar | 1.15M |
| Samara | 1.15M |
| Ufa | 1.14M |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons