Lithuania has a population density of 119.5 people per square mile compared to 45.3 people in Paraguay. Lithuania has 243,376 sq ft of land per person vs 631,864 sq ft in Paraguay. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Lithuania and Paraguay are ranked 142nd and 176th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Lithuania has 0.04% of the world's population and 0.04% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.09% of the population and 0.27% of the land area for Paraguay, hence the population density in Lithuania is 163.7% higher than in Paraguay.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 119.5 ppl/mi² | 45.3 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 142/197 | 176/197 |
| Population |
2858798
|
7079103
|
| Land area | 24,170 sq mi | 152,901 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 233,313 sq ft | 615,174 sq ft |
| Rural population | 31.1% | 36.5% |
| Urban population | 68.9% | 63.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Lithuania vs Paraguay:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Lithuania decreased by 14.4%, compared to a 29% growth in Paraguay.
In 2004, Lithuania ranked 119th for population density and is in 142nd place now. Paraguay was 168th in 2004 and ranks 176th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 119.5 | 45.3 |
| 2023 | 118.8 | 44.8 |
| 2022 | 117.1 | 44.2 |
| 2021 | 116.2 | 43.6 |
| 2020 | 116.2 | 43 |
| 2019 | 116.3 | 42.5 |
| 2018 | 116.6 | 41.9 |
| 2017 | 117.5 | 41.3 |
| 2016 | 119 | 40.7 |
| 2015 | 120.3 | 40.2 |
| 2014 | 121.4 | 39.6 |
| 2013 | 122.4 | 39 |
| 2012 | 123.5 | 38.4 |
| 2011 | 125.1 | 37.9 |
| 2010 | 128 | 37.4 |
| 2009 | 130.7 | 37 |
| 2008 | 132.2 | 36.6 |
| 2007 | 133.5 | 36.2 |
| 2006 | 135.1 | 35.9 |
| 2005 | 137.3 | 35.5 |
| 2004 | 139.5 | 35.1 |
| 2003 | 141.1 | 34.7 |
| 2002 | 142.3 | 34.3 |
| 2001 | 143.4 | 33.8 |
| 2000 | 144.6 | 33.3 |
| 1999 | 145.6 | 32.6 |
| 1998 | 146.7 | 31.9 |
| 1997 | 147.7 | 31.3 |
| 1996 | 148.8 | 30.6 |
| 1995 | 150 | 29.9 |
| 1994 | 151.1 | 29.1 |
| 1993 | 152.2 | 28.4 |
| 1992 | 152.9 | 27.7 |
| 1991 | - | 27 |
| 1990 | - | 26.3 |
| 1989 | - | 25.6 |
| 1988 | - | 24.9 |
| 1987 | - | 24.2 |
| 1986 | - | 23.5 |
| 1985 | - | 22.9 |
| 1984 | - | 22.2 |
| 1983 | - | 21.6 |
| 1982 | - | 21 |
| 1981 | - | 20.5 |
| 1980 | - | 19.9 |
| 1979 | - | 19.4 |
| 1978 | - | 18.9 |
| 1977 | - | 18.4 |
| 1976 | - | 18 |
| 1975 | - | 17.5 |
| 1974 | - | 17.1 |
| 1973 | - | 16.7 |
| 1972 | - | 16.3 |
| 1971 | - | 15.9 |
| 1970 | - | 15.6 |
| 1969 | - | 15.2 |
| 1968 | - | 14.9 |
| 1967 | - | 14.5 |
| 1966 | - | 14.2 |
| 1965 | - | 13.9 |
| 1964 | - | 13.5 |
| 1963 | - | 13.2 |
| 1962 | - | 12.9 |
| 1961 | - | 12.6 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 68.9% | 63.5% |
| 2023 | 68.7% | 63.1% |
| 2022 | 68.5% | 62.8% |
| 2021 | 68.2% | 62.5% |
| 2020 | 68% | 62.2% |
| 2019 | 67.9% | 61.9% |
| 2018 | 67.7% | 61.6% |
| 2017 | 67.5% | 61.3% |
| 2016 | 67.4% | 61% |
| 2015 | 67.2% | 60.7% |
| 2014 | 67.1% | 60.5% |
| 2013 | 67% | 60.2% |
| 2012 | 66.9% | 59.9% |
| 2011 | 66.7% | 59.6% |
| 2010 | 66.8% | 59.3% |
| 2009 | 66.8% | 58.9% |
| 2008 | 66.8% | 58.6% |
| 2007 | 66.8% | 58.3% |
| 2006 | 66.7% | 58% |
| 2005 | 66.6% | 57.6% |
| 2004 | 66.6% | 57.3% |
| 2003 | 66.7% | 57% |
| 2002 | 66.8% | 56.6% |
| 2001 | 66.9% | 56% |
| 2000 | 67% | 55.3% |
| 1999 | 67% | 54.7% |
| 1998 | 67.1% | 54.1% |
| 1997 | 67.2% | 53.4% |
| 1996 | 67.2% | 52.8% |
| 1995 | 67.3% | 52.1% |
| 1994 | 67.3% | 51.5% |
| 1993 | 67.4% | 50.8% |
| 1992 | 67.5% | 50.2% |
| 1991 | 67.5% | 49.4% |
| 1990 | 67.6% | 48.7% |
| 1989 | 67.6% | 47.9% |
| 1988 | 67.3% | 47.2% |
| 1987 | 66.5% | 46.5% |
| 1986 | 65.8% | 45.7% |
| 1985 | 65% | 45% |
| 1984 | 64.3% | 44.2% |
| 1983 | 63.5% | 43.5% |
| 1982 | 62.7% | 42.8% |
| 1981 | 61.9% | 42.2% |
| 1980 | 61.2% | 41.7% |
| 1979 | 60.4% | 41.1% |
| 1978 | 59.3% | 40.6% |
| 1977 | 58.1% | 40.1% |
| 1976 | 56.9% | 39.5% |
| 1975 | 55.7% | 39% |
| 1974 | 54.5% | 38.4% |
| 1973 | 53.2% | 37.9% |
| 1972 | 52% | 37.4% |
| 1971 | 50.7% | 37.2% |
| 1970 | 49.6% | 37.1% |
| 1969 | 48.5% | 36.9% |
| 1968 | 47.5% | 36.7% |
| 1967 | 46.5% | 36.6% |
| 1966 | 45.5% | 36.4% |
| 1965 | 44.5% | 36.2% |
| 1964 | 43.4% | 36.1% |
| 1963 | 42.4% | 35.9% |
| 1962 | 41.4% | 35.8% |
| 1961 | 40.4% | 35.7% |
| 1960 | 39.5% | 35.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 66.6% to 68.9% in Lithuania and from 57.3% to 63.5% in Paraguay.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Vilnius | 581K |
| Kaunas | 305K |
| Klaipeda | 158K |
| Siauliai | 104K |
| Panevezys | 87.9K |
| Alytus | 51.9K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Asuncion | 462K |
| Ciudad del Este | 350K |
| Luque | 260K |
| San Lorenzo | 225K |
| Pedro Juan Caballero | 127K |
| Caaguazu | 127K |
| Encarnacion | 107K |
| Coronel Oviedo | 52.4K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons