Malta has a population density of 4,704 people per square mile compared to 184.1 people in Moldova. Malta has 5,979 sq ft of land per person vs 151,641 sq ft in Moldova. Malta and Moldova rank 5th and 120th by population density, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Malta has 0.007% of the world's population and 0.0002% of all countries' land area, compared to 0.03% of the population and 0.02% of the land area for Moldova, making the population density in Malta 2,454% higher than in Moldova.
Population density by year
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
Malta
|
Moldova
|
|
| 2026 | 4,704 | 184.1 |
| 2025 | 4,659 | 186.7 |
| 2024 | 4,604 | 188.9 |
| 2023 | 4,474 | 193.3 |
| 2022 | 4,299 | 199.2 |
| 2021 | 4,194 | 204.4 |
| 2020 | 4,172 | 207.5 |
| 2019 | 4,079 | 209.8 |
| 2018 | 3,917 | 213.2 |
| 2017 | 3,781 | 217 |
| 2016 | 3,679 | 220.8 |
| 2015 | 3,595 | 223.4 |
| 2014 | 3,508 | 225.1 |
| 2013 | 3,438 | 225.3 |
| 2012 | 3,400 | 225.4 |
| 2011 | 3,369 | 225.5 |
| 2010 | 3,355 | 225.7 |
| 2009 | 3,338 | 225.6 |
| 2008 | 3,313 | 225.9 |
| 2007 | 3,292 | 226.3 |
| 2006 | 3,280 | 226.9 |
| 2005 | 3,269 | 227.5 |
| 2004 | 3,248 | 228.1 |
| 2003 | 3,226 | 228.8 |
| 2002 | 3,205 | 229.3 |
| 2001 | 3,181 | 229.9 |
| 2000 | 3,157 | 230.4 |
| 1999 | 3,137 | 230.7 |
| 1998 | 3,118 | 231 |
| 1997 | 3,098 | 231 |
| 1996 | 3,075 | 231.8 |
| 1995 | 3,055 | 232.3 |
| 1994 | 3,033 | 233.3 |
| 1993 | 3,005 | 233.9 |
| 1992 | 2,975 | 234.9 |
| 1991 | 2,945 | - |
| 1990 | 2,867 | - |
| 1989 | 2,839 | - |
| 1988 | 2,811 | - |
| 1987 | 2,788 | - |
| 1986 | 2,769 | - |
| 1985 | 2,723 | - |
| 1984 | 2,676 | - |
| 1983 | 2,675 | - |
| 1982 | 2,638 | - |
| 1981 | 2,582 | - |
| 1980 | 2,563 | - |
| 1979 | 2,536 | - |
| 1978 | 2,511 | - |
| 1977 | 2,485 | - |
| 1976 | 2,475 | - |
| 1975 | 2,462 | - |
| 1974 | 2,444 | - |
| 1973 | 2,446 | - |
| 1972 | 2,448 | - |
| 1971 | 2,450 | - |
| 1970 | 2,450 | - |
| 1969 | 2,463 | - |
| 1968 | 2,492 | - |
| 1967 | 2,522 | - |
| 1966 | 2,551 | - |
| 1965 | 2,580 | - |
| 1964 | 2,600 | - |
| 1963 | 2,611 | - |
| 1962 | 2,622 | - |
| 1961 | 2,632 | - |
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (2025–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10).
GeoRank.org/population-density/malta/moldova | CC BY 
From 2006 to 2026, population density in Malta increased by 43.4%, compared to a 18.8% decline in Moldova.
In 2006, Malta ranked 5th by population density and is 5th still. Moldova was 85th in 2006 and ranks 120th out of 197 currently.
Population density comparison
|
Malta
|
Moldova
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 4,704 ppl/mi² | 184.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 5/197 | 120/197 |
| Population |
581729
|
2341166
|
| Land area | 123.6 sq mi | 12,714 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 6,055 sq ft | 147,548 sq ft |
| Rural population | 4.35% | 56.5% |
| Urban population | 95.7% | 43.5% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Malta
|
Moldova
|
|
| 2024 | 95.7% | 43.5% |
| 2023 | 95.6% | 43% |
| 2022 | 95.6% | 42.4% |
| 2021 | 95.5% | 41.8% |
| 2020 | 95.2% | 41.3% |
| 2019 | 94.9% | 40.8% |
| 2018 | 94.7% | 40.3% |
| 2017 | 94.6% | 40% |
| 2016 | 94.5% | 39.7% |
| 2015 | 94.4% | 39.7% |
| 2014 | 94.4% | 39.6% |
| 2013 | 94.4% | 39.4% |
| 2012 | 94.4% | 39.4% |
| 2011 | 94.3% | 39.3% |
| 2010 | 94.2% | 39.3% |
| 2009 | 94.1% | 39.3% |
| 2008 | 94% | 39.4% |
| 2007 | 93.9% | 39.4% |
| 2006 | 93.8% | 39.2% |
| 2005 | 93.7% | 39.4% |
| 2004 | 93.6% | 39.4% |
| 2003 | 93.5% | 39.6% |
| 2002 | 93.4% | 39.6% |
| 2001 | 93.4% | 39.7% |
| 2000 | 93.3% | 40.4% |
| 1999 | 93.2% | 40.5% |
| 1998 | 93.1% | 40.7% |
| 1997 | 93% | 44.9% |
| 1996 | 92.9% | 45.1% |
| 1995 | 92.7% | 45.7% |
| 1994 | 92.5% | 45.9% |
| 1993 | 92.2% | 46.1% |
| 1992 | 91.8% | 46.4% |
| 1991 | 91.4% | 46.9% |
| 1990 | 91% | 47% |
| 1989 | 90.7% | 47.2% |
| 1988 | 90.3% | 46.4% |
| 1987 | 90.1% | 45.3% |
| 1986 | 89.9% | 44.3% |
| 1985 | 89.8% | 43.5% |
| 1984 | 89.8% | 42.8% |
| 1983 | 89.7% | 41.9% |
| 1982 | 89.7% | 41.2% |
| 1981 | 89.6% | 40.6% |
| 1980 | 89.6% | 40% |
| 1979 | 89.6% | 39.5% |
| 1978 | 89.5% | 38.8% |
| 1977 | 89.5% | 37.9% |
| 1976 | 89.5% | 37.2% |
| 1975 | 89.4% | 36.4% |
| 1974 | 89.4% | 35.5% |
| 1973 | 89.4% | 34.8% |
| 1972 | 89.4% | 33.8% |
| 1971 | 89.4% | 32.8% |
| 1970 | 89.4% | 32% |
| 1969 | 89.4% | 31.1% |
| 1968 | 89.4% | 30.1% |
| 1967 | 89.4% | 29.2% |
| 1966 | 89.4% | 28.5% |
| 1965 | 89.5% | 27.2% |
| 1964 | 89.6% | 25.8% |
| 1963 | 89.7% | 25.1% |
| 1962 | 89.9% | 24.5% |
| 1961 | 90% | 24% |
| 1960 | 90.1% | 23.2% |
Data sources: World Bank | Health (1960–2024, retrieved 2026-04-06).
GeoRank.org/population-density/malta/moldova | CC BY
From 2004 to 2024, the share of urban population changed from 93.6% to 95.7% in Malta and from 39.4% to 43.5% in Moldova.
Densely populated cities
|
Moldova
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Chisinau | 567K |
| Tiraspol | 134K |
| Balti | 91K |
| Bender | 76.2K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
Data sources: World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06); United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10); U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08); Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20).
GeoRank.org/population-density/malta/moldova | CC BY
Help us show the world through your eyes
Share a photo of your city and help others discover what it looks like to live there. Your contribution makes our data come alive.
Data sources:
- World Bank | Agriculture & Rural Development (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-04-06)
- United Nations | World Population Prospects (1961–2026, retrieved 2026-03-10)
- U.S. Census Bureau (1961–2025, retrieved 2026-02-08)
- Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) (2000–2019, retrieved 2026-02-20)
- Wikidata (2014–2024, retrieved 2026-02-08)
Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) — you’re free to copy, share, remix, adapt, and use even commercially as long as you give appropriate credit and clearly indicate if you made changes. Other sources may be subject to different license terms.