Colombia has a population density of 123.5 people per square mile compared to 187.1 people in Eswatini. Colombia has 232,379 sq ft of land per person vs 150,387 sq ft in Eswatini. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Colombia and Eswatini are ranked 140th and 119th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Colombia has 0.65% of the world's population and 0.74% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.02% of the population and 0.01% of the land area for Eswatini, hence the population density in Colombia is 34% lower than in Eswatini.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 123.5 ppl/mi² | 187.1 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 140/197 | 119/197 |
| Population |
53835787
|
1267161
|
| Land area | 428,380 sq mi | 6,641 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 225,815 sq ft | 148,967 sq ft |
| Rural population | 17.3% | 75% |
| Urban population | 82.7% | 25% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 27.2% | 0% |
Colombia vs Eswatini:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Colombia increased by 27.3%, compared to a 15.8% growth in Eswatini.
In 2004, Colombia ranked 133rd for population density and is in 140th place now. Eswatini was 110th in 2004 and ranks 119th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 123.5 | 187.1 |
| 2023 | 122.1 | 185.3 |
| 2022 | 120.8 | 183.5 |
| 2021 | 119.5 | 181.7 |
| 2020 | 118.2 | 179.6 |
| 2019 | 116.5 | 177.7 |
| 2018 | 114.4 | 176 |
| 2017 | 112.4 | 174.4 |
| 2016 | 110.7 | 173.1 |
| 2015 | 109.6 | 172.1 |
| 2014 | 108.7 | 171.1 |
| 2013 | 107.7 | 170.2 |
| 2012 | 106.7 | 169.2 |
| 2011 | 105.7 | 168.3 |
| 2010 | 104.5 | 167.4 |
| 2009 | 103.3 | 166.4 |
| 2008 | 102.1 | 165.4 |
| 2007 | 100.9 | 164.2 |
| 2006 | 99.7 | 163.3 |
| 2005 | 98.3 | 162.5 |
| 2004 | 97 | 161.6 |
| 2003 | 95.6 | 160.6 |
| 2002 | 94.1 | 159.5 |
| 2001 | 92.7 | 158.3 |
| 2000 | 91.3 | 156.8 |
| 1999 | 89.8 | 155.2 |
| 1998 | 88.2 | 153.5 |
| 1997 | 86.7 | 151.6 |
| 1996 | 85.1 | 149.1 |
| 1995 | 83.6 | 146.1 |
| 1994 | 82 | 146.2 |
| 1993 | 80.4 | 146.3 |
| 1992 | 78.8 | 142.1 |
| 1991 | 77.3 | 136.8 |
| 1990 | 75.7 | 131.4 |
| 1989 | 74.2 | 126.2 |
| 1988 | 72.7 | 120.4 |
| 1987 | 71.2 | 115 |
| 1986 | 69.7 | 110.6 |
| 1985 | 68.3 | 106.3 |
| 1984 | 66.9 | 102.5 |
| 1983 | 65.3 | 99.2 |
| 1982 | 63.8 | 96 |
| 1981 | 62.4 | 92.9 |
| 1980 | 60.9 | 89.8 |
| 1979 | 59.6 | 86.9 |
| 1978 | 58.2 | 84.1 |
| 1977 | 56.9 | 81.4 |
| 1976 | 55.7 | 78.8 |
| 1975 | 54.5 | 76.4 |
| 1974 | 53.3 | 74.2 |
| 1973 | 52.1 | 72.1 |
| 1972 | 50.9 | 70.1 |
| 1971 | 49.8 | 68.2 |
| 1970 | 48.6 | 66.4 |
| 1969 | 47.4 | 64.7 |
| 1968 | 46.1 | 63.1 |
| 1967 | 44.9 | 61.6 |
| 1966 | 43.7 | 60 |
| 1965 | 42.4 | 58.5 |
| 1964 | 41.2 | 57 |
| 1963 | 40 | 55.7 |
| 1962 | 38.7 | 54.4 |
| 1961 | 37.6 | 53.2 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 82.7% | 25% |
| 2023 | 82.4% | 24.8% |
| 2022 | 82% | 24.6% |
| 2021 | 81.7% | 24.4% |
| 2020 | 81.4% | 24.2% |
| 2019 | 81.1% | 24% |
| 2018 | 80.8% | 23.8% |
| 2017 | 80.4% | 23.6% |
| 2016 | 80.1% | 23.5% |
| 2015 | 79.8% | 23.3% |
| 2014 | 79.4% | 23.1% |
| 2013 | 79.1% | 23% |
| 2012 | 78.7% | 22.8% |
| 2011 | 78.3% | 22.7% |
| 2010 | 78% | 22.5% |
| 2009 | 77.6% | 22.3% |
| 2008 | 77.2% | 22% |
| 2007 | 76.8% | 21.8% |
| 2006 | 76.4% | 21.9% |
| 2005 | 76% | 22% |
| 2004 | 75.6% | 22.2% |
| 2003 | 75.2% | 22.3% |
| 2002 | 74.8% | 22.4% |
| 2001 | 74.4% | 22.6% |
| 2000 | 74% | 22.7% |
| 1999 | 73.5% | 22.8% |
| 1998 | 73.1% | 22.9% |
| 1997 | 72.7% | 23.1% |
| 1996 | 72.2% | 22.7% |
| 1995 | 71.8% | 22.3% |
| 1994 | 71.3% | 21.9% |
| 1993 | 70.9% | 21.4% |
| 1992 | 70.4% | 21% |
| 1991 | 69.9% | 20.6% |
| 1990 | 69.5% | 20.2% |
| 1989 | 69% | 19.8% |
| 1988 | 68.5% | 19.4% |
| 1987 | 68.1% | 19% |
| 1986 | 67.6% | 18.6% |
| 1985 | 67% | 18.3% |
| 1984 | 66.4% | 17.9% |
| 1983 | 65.7% | 17.5% |
| 1982 | 65.1% | 17.2% |
| 1981 | 64.4% | 16.8% |
| 1980 | 63.7% | 16.5% |
| 1979 | 63.1% | 16.1% |
| 1978 | 62.4% | 15.8% |
| 1977 | 61.7% | 15.5% |
| 1976 | 61% | 15% |
| 1975 | 60.3% | 14% |
| 1974 | 59.6% | 13% |
| 1973 | 58.9% | 12.1% |
| 1972 | 58.1% | 11.3% |
| 1971 | 57.4% | 10.5% |
| 1970 | 56.6% | 9.7% |
| 1969 | 55.9% | 9% |
| 1968 | 55.1% | 8.34% |
| 1967 | 54.4% | 7.73% |
| 1966 | 53.6% | 7.16% |
| 1965 | 52.8% | 6.49% |
| 1964 | 52% | 5.88% |
| 1963 | 50.6% | 5.31% |
| 1962 | 49.1% | 4.8% |
| 1961 | 47.7% | 4.34% |
| 1960 | 46.3% | 3.91% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 75.6% to 82.7% in Colombia and from 22.2% to 25% in Eswatini.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Bogota | 8.03M |
| Medellin | 2.53M |
| Cali | 2.47M |
| Barranquilla | 1.33M |
| Cartagena | 915K |
| Cucuta | 806K |
| Soacha | 783K |
| Soledad | 676K |
| Villavicencio | 664K |
| Bucaramanga | 615K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons