Eswatini has a population density of 187.1 people per square mile compared to 49 people in South Sudan. Eswatini has 150,387 sq ft of land per person vs 580,697 sq ft in South Sudan. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Eswatini and South Sudan are ranked 119th and 172nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Eswatini has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.15% of the population and 0.42% of the land area for South Sudan, hence the population density in Eswatini is 282.3% higher than in South Sudan.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 187.1 ppl/mi² | 49 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 119/197 | 172/197 |
| Population |
1267161
|
12387398
|
| Land area | 6,641 sq mi | 243,990 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 148,967 sq ft | 569,522 sq ft |
| Rural population | 75% | 78.4% |
| Urban population | 25% | 21.6% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Eswatini vs South Sudan:
Population density chart by year
From 2012 to 2024, population density in Eswatini increased by 10.6%, compared to a 11% growth in South Sudan.
In 2012, Eswatini ranked 118th for population density and is in 119th place now. South Sudan was 169th in 2012 and ranks 172nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 187.1 | 49 |
| 2023 | 185.3 | 47.1 |
| 2022 | 183.5 | 45.2 |
| 2021 | 181.7 | 44.5 |
| 2020 | 179.6 | 43.8 |
| 2019 | 177.7 | 42.7 |
| 2018 | 176 | 41.5 |
| 2017 | 174.4 | 42 |
| 2016 | 173.1 | 44.4 |
| 2015 | 172.1 | 45.5 |
| 2014 | 171.1 | 46 |
| 2013 | 170.2 | 45.8 |
| 2012 | 169.2 | 44.1 |
| 2011 | 168.3 | - |
| 2010 | 167.4 | - |
| 2009 | 166.4 | - |
| 2008 | 165.4 | - |
| 2007 | 164.2 | - |
| 2006 | 163.3 | - |
| 2005 | 162.5 | - |
| 2004 | 161.6 | - |
| 2003 | 160.6 | - |
| 2002 | 159.5 | - |
| 2001 | 158.3 | - |
| 2000 | 156.8 | - |
| 1999 | 155.2 | - |
| 1998 | 153.5 | - |
| 1997 | 151.6 | - |
| 1996 | 149.1 | - |
| 1995 | 146.1 | - |
| 1994 | 146.2 | - |
| 1993 | 146.3 | - |
| 1992 | 142.1 | - |
| 1991 | 136.8 | - |
| 1990 | 131.4 | - |
| 1989 | 126.2 | - |
| 1988 | 120.4 | - |
| 1987 | 115 | - |
| 1986 | 110.6 | - |
| 1985 | 106.3 | - |
| 1984 | 102.5 | - |
| 1983 | 99.2 | - |
| 1982 | 96 | - |
| 1981 | 92.9 | - |
| 1980 | 89.8 | - |
| 1979 | 86.9 | - |
| 1978 | 84.1 | - |
| 1977 | 81.4 | - |
| 1976 | 78.8 | - |
| 1975 | 76.4 | - |
| 1974 | 74.2 | - |
| 1973 | 72.1 | - |
| 1972 | 70.1 | - |
| 1971 | 68.2 | - |
| 1970 | 66.4 | - |
| 1969 | 64.7 | - |
| 1968 | 63.1 | - |
| 1967 | 61.6 | - |
| 1966 | 60 | - |
| 1965 | 58.5 | - |
| 1964 | 57 | - |
| 1963 | 55.7 | - |
| 1962 | 54.4 | - |
| 1961 | 53.2 | - |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 25% | 21.6% |
| 2023 | 24.8% | 21.2% |
| 2022 | 24.6% | 20.8% |
| 2021 | 24.4% | 20.5% |
| 2020 | 24.2% | 20.2% |
| 2019 | 24% | 19.9% |
| 2018 | 23.8% | 19.6% |
| 2017 | 23.6% | 19.3% |
| 2016 | 23.5% | 19.1% |
| 2015 | 23.3% | 18.9% |
| 2014 | 23.1% | 18.6% |
| 2013 | 23% | 18.4% |
| 2012 | 22.8% | 18.2% |
| 2011 | 22.7% | 18% |
| 2010 | 22.5% | 17.9% |
| 2009 | 22.3% | 17.7% |
| 2008 | 22% | 17.6% |
| 2007 | 21.8% | 17.4% |
| 2006 | 21.9% | 17.3% |
| 2005 | 22% | 17.2% |
| 2004 | 22.2% | 17% |
| 2003 | 22.3% | 16.9% |
| 2002 | 22.4% | 16.8% |
| 2001 | 22.6% | 16.6% |
| 2000 | 22.7% | 16.5% |
| 1999 | 22.8% | 16.4% |
| 1998 | 22.9% | 16.2% |
| 1997 | 23.1% | 16.1% |
| 1996 | 22.7% | 16% |
| 1995 | 22.3% | 15.9% |
| 1994 | 21.9% | 15.7% |
| 1993 | 21.4% | 15.6% |
| 1992 | 21% | 14.9% |
| 1991 | 20.6% | 14.1% |
| 1990 | 20.2% | 13.3% |
| 1989 | 19.8% | 12.5% |
| 1988 | 19.4% | 11.8% |
| 1987 | 19% | 11.1% |
| 1986 | 18.6% | 10.5% |
| 1985 | 18.3% | 9.84% |
| 1984 | 17.9% | 9.26% |
| 1983 | 17.5% | 8.71% |
| 1982 | 17.2% | 8.5% |
| 1981 | 16.8% | 8.51% |
| 1980 | 16.5% | 8.52% |
| 1979 | 16.1% | 8.53% |
| 1978 | 15.8% | 8.54% |
| 1977 | 15.5% | 8.55% |
| 1976 | 15% | 8.57% |
| 1975 | 14% | 8.58% |
| 1974 | 13% | 8.59% |
| 1973 | 12.1% | 8.6% |
| 1972 | 11.3% | 8.61% |
| 1971 | 10.5% | 8.62% |
| 1970 | 9.7% | 8.63% |
| 1969 | 9% | 8.64% |
| 1968 | 8.34% | 8.66% |
| 1967 | 7.73% | 8.67% |
| 1966 | 7.16% | 8.68% |
| 1965 | 6.49% | 8.69% |
| 1964 | 5.88% | 8.7% |
| 1963 | 5.31% | 8.71% |
| 1962 | 4.8% | 8.73% |
| 1961 | 4.34% | 8.74% |
| 1960 | 3.91% | 8.75% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 22.2% to 25% in Eswatini and from 17% to 21.6% in South Sudan.
Densely populated cities
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons