Eswatini has a population density of 187.1 people per square mile compared to 271.4 people in Hungary. Eswatini has 150,387 sq ft of land per person vs 104,699 sq ft in Hungary. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Eswatini and Hungary are ranked 119th and 90th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Eswatini has 0.02% of the world's population and 0.01% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.12% of the population and 0.06% of the land area for Hungary, hence the population density in Eswatini is 31% lower than in Hungary.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 187.1 ppl/mi² | 271.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 119/197 | 90/197 |
| Population |
1267161
|
9518980
|
| Land area | 6,641 sq mi | 35,236 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 148,967 sq ft | 102,728 sq ft |
| Rural population | 75% | 26.8% |
| Urban population | 25% | 73.2% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 17.6% |
Eswatini vs Hungary:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Eswatini increased by 15.8%, compared to a 7.09% decline in Hungary.
In 2004, Eswatini ranked 110th for population density and is in 119th place now. Hungary was 69th in 2004 and ranks 90th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 187.1 | 271.4 |
| 2023 | 185.3 | 272.2 |
| 2022 | 183.5 | 272.6 |
| 2021 | 181.7 | 273.3 |
| 2020 | 179.6 | 274.4 |
| 2019 | 177.7 | 275.1 |
| 2018 | 176 | 275.5 |
| 2017 | 174.4 | 276 |
| 2016 | 173.1 | 277 |
| 2015 | 172.1 | 278.1 |
| 2014 | 171.1 | 279.1 |
| 2013 | 170.2 | 282.5 |
| 2012 | 169.2 | 283.8 |
| 2011 | 168.3 | 285.3 |
| 2010 | 167.4 | 286.1 |
| 2009 | 166.4 | 286.7 |
| 2008 | 165.4 | 290.1 |
| 2007 | 164.2 | 290.6 |
| 2006 | 163.3 | 291.1 |
| 2005 | 162.5 | 291.5 |
| 2004 | 161.6 | 292.1 |
| 2003 | 160.6 | 292.7 |
| 2002 | 159.5 | 293.6 |
| 2001 | 158.3 | 294.4 |
| 2000 | 156.8 | 295.1 |
| 1999 | 155.2 | 295.3 |
| 1998 | 153.5 | 296.1 |
| 1997 | 151.6 | 296.8 |
| 1996 | 149.1 | 297.2 |
| 1995 | 146.1 | 297.7 |
| 1994 | 146.2 | 298.1 |
| 1993 | 146.3 | 298.5 |
| 1992 | 142.1 | 298.8 |
| 1991 | 136.8 | 299 |
| 1990 | 131.4 | 299 |
| 1989 | 126.2 | 302 |
| 1988 | 120.4 | 305 |
| 1987 | 115 | 306 |
| 1986 | 110.6 | 306 |
| 1985 | 106.3 | 307 |
| 1984 | 102.5 | 307 |
| 1983 | 99.2 | 308 |
| 1982 | 96 | 308 |
| 1981 | 92.9 | 309 |
| 1980 | 89.8 | 309 |
| 1979 | 86.9 | 308 |
| 1978 | 84.1 | 308 |
| 1977 | 81.4 | 307 |
| 1976 | 78.8 | 305 |
| 1975 | 76.4 | 303 |
| 1974 | 74.2 | 302 |
| 1973 | 72.1 | 300 |
| 1972 | 70.1 | 299.3 |
| 1971 | 68.2 | 298.5 |
| 1970 | 66.4 | 297.6 |
| 1969 | 64.7 | 296.4 |
| 1968 | 63.1 | 295.2 |
| 1967 | 61.6 | 294 |
| 1966 | 60 | 292.9 |
| 1965 | 58.5 | 292 |
| 1964 | 57 | 291.1 |
| 1963 | 55.7 | 290.2 |
| 1962 | 54.4 | 289.5 |
| 1961 | 53.2 | 288.5 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 25% | 73.2% |
| 2023 | 24.8% | 72.9% |
| 2022 | 24.6% | 72.6% |
| 2021 | 24.4% | 72.2% |
| 2020 | 24.2% | 71.9% |
| 2019 | 24% | 71.6% |
| 2018 | 23.8% | 71.4% |
| 2017 | 23.6% | 71.1% |
| 2016 | 23.5% | 70.8% |
| 2015 | 23.3% | 70.5% |
| 2014 | 23.1% | 70.2% |
| 2013 | 23% | 70% |
| 2012 | 22.8% | 69.7% |
| 2011 | 22.7% | 69.4% |
| 2010 | 22.5% | 68.9% |
| 2009 | 22.3% | 68.5% |
| 2008 | 22% | 67.9% |
| 2007 | 21.8% | 67.4% |
| 2006 | 21.9% | 66.9% |
| 2005 | 22% | 66.4% |
| 2004 | 22.2% | 65.9% |
| 2003 | 22.3% | 65.5% |
| 2002 | 22.4% | 65.1% |
| 2001 | 22.6% | 64.7% |
| 2000 | 22.7% | 64.6% |
| 1999 | 22.8% | 64.7% |
| 1998 | 22.9% | 64.8% |
| 1997 | 23.1% | 65% |
| 1996 | 22.7% | 65.1% |
| 1995 | 22.3% | 65.2% |
| 1994 | 21.9% | 65.3% |
| 1993 | 21.4% | 65.5% |
| 1992 | 21% | 65.6% |
| 1991 | 20.6% | 65.7% |
| 1990 | 20.2% | 65.8% |
| 1989 | 19.8% | 65.8% |
| 1988 | 19.4% | 65.6% |
| 1987 | 19% | 65.5% |
| 1986 | 18.6% | 65.3% |
| 1985 | 18.3% | 65.1% |
| 1984 | 17.9% | 64.9% |
| 1983 | 17.5% | 64.7% |
| 1982 | 17.2% | 64.6% |
| 1981 | 16.8% | 64.4% |
| 1980 | 16.5% | 64.2% |
| 1979 | 16.1% | 63.9% |
| 1978 | 15.8% | 63.5% |
| 1977 | 15.5% | 63.1% |
| 1976 | 15% | 62.6% |
| 1975 | 14% | 62.2% |
| 1974 | 13% | 61.8% |
| 1973 | 12.1% | 61.4% |
| 1972 | 11.3% | 61% |
| 1971 | 10.5% | 60.5% |
| 1970 | 9.7% | 60.1% |
| 1969 | 9% | 59.7% |
| 1968 | 8.34% | 59.3% |
| 1967 | 7.73% | 58.9% |
| 1966 | 7.16% | 58.4% |
| 1965 | 6.49% | 58% |
| 1964 | 5.88% | 57.6% |
| 1963 | 5.31% | 57.2% |
| 1962 | 4.8% | 56.8% |
| 1961 | 4.34% | 56.3% |
| 1960 | 3.91% | 55.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 22.2% to 25% in Eswatini and from 65.9% to 73.2% in Hungary.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Budapest | 1.69M |
| Debrecen | 202K |
| Miskolc | 144K |
| Pecs | 140K |
| Gyor | 130K |
| Nyiregyhaza | 115K |
| Kecskemet | 109K |
| Szekesfehervar | 96K |
| Szombathely | 77.8K |
| Erd | 71.3K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons