Malaysia has a population density of 280.3 people per square mile compared to 39.6 people in Norway. Malaysia has 100,140 sq ft of land per person vs 744,101 sq ft in Norway. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Malaysia and Norway are ranked 85th and 182nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Malaysia has 0.44% of the world's population and 0.22% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.24% of the land area for Norway, hence the population density in Malaysia is 607% higher than in Norway.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 280.3 ppl/mi² | 39.6 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 85/197 | 182/197 |
| Population |
36304998
|
5642662
|
| Land area | 126,854 sq mi | 140,645 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 99,458 sq ft | 703,657 sq ft |
| Rural population | 20.8% | 15.7% |
| Urban population | 79.2% | 84.3% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 5.57% | 0% |
Malaysia vs Norway:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Malaysia increased by 40.8%, compared to a 21.7% growth in Norway.
In 2004, Malaysia ranked 93rd for population density and is in 85th place now. Norway was 169th in 2004 and ranks 182nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 280.3 | 39.6 |
| 2023 | 276.9 | 39.2 |
| 2022 | 273.5 | 38.8 |
| 2021 | 270.3 | 38.5 |
| 2020 | 267.2 | 38.2 |
| 2019 | 263.6 | 37.9 |
| 2018 | 259.4 | 37.7 |
| 2017 | 255.1 | 37.4 |
| 2016 | 250.6 | 37.1 |
| 2015 | 246.2 | 36.8 |
| 2014 | 242 | 36.4 |
| 2013 | 237.9 | 36 |
| 2012 | 233.8 | 35.6 |
| 2011 | 229.9 | 35.1 |
| 2010 | 225.9 | 34.7 |
| 2009 | 221.7 | 34.2 |
| 2008 | 217.3 | 33.8 |
| 2007 | 212.8 | 33.4 |
| 2006 | 208.3 | 33 |
| 2005 | 203.7 | 32.8 |
| 2004 | 199.1 | 32.6 |
| 2003 | 194.6 | 32.4 |
| 2002 | 190 | 32.2 |
| 2001 | 185.5 | 32 |
| 2000 | 181.1 | 31.8 |
| 1999 | 176.9 | 31.6 |
| 1998 | 172.7 | 31.4 |
| 1997 | 168.5 | 31.2 |
| 1996 | 164.4 | 31.1 |
| 1995 | 160.3 | 30.9 |
| 1994 | 156.2 | 30.8 |
| 1993 | 152.3 | 30.6 |
| 1992 | 148.5 | 30.4 |
| 1991 | 144.6 | 30.2 |
| 1990 | 140.6 | 30.1 |
| 1989 | 136.5 | 30 |
| 1988 | 132.4 | 29.8 |
| 1987 | 128.3 | 29.7 |
| 1986 | 124.2 | 29.6 |
| 1985 | 120.2 | 29.4 |
| 1984 | 116.3 | 29.4 |
| 1983 | 112.6 | 29.3 |
| 1982 | 109 | 29.2 |
| 1981 | 105.6 | 29.1 |
| 1980 | 102.3 | 29 |
| 1979 | 99.5 | 28.9 |
| 1978 | 97.2 | 28.8 |
| 1977 | 94.9 | 28.7 |
| 1976 | 92.6 | 28.5 |
| 1975 | 90.4 | 28.4 |
| 1974 | 88.3 | 28.3 |
| 1973 | 86.2 | 28.1 |
| 1972 | 84.2 | 27.9 |
| 1971 | 82.2 | 27.7 |
| 1970 | 80.2 | 27.5 |
| 1969 | 78.4 | 27.3 |
| 1968 | 76.7 | 27.1 |
| 1967 | 74.9 | 26.8 |
| 1966 | 73.2 | 26.6 |
| 1965 | 71.4 | 26.4 |
| 1964 | 69.6 | 26.2 |
| 1963 | 67.8 | 26 |
| 1962 | 66.1 | 25.8 |
| 1961 | 64.4 | 25.6 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 79.2% | 84.3% |
| 2023 | 78.7% | 84% |
| 2022 | 78.2% | 83.7% |
| 2021 | 77.7% | 83.3% |
| 2020 | 77.2% | 83% |
| 2019 | 76.6% | 82.6% |
| 2018 | 76% | 82.2% |
| 2017 | 75.4% | 81.9% |
| 2016 | 74.8% | 81.5% |
| 2015 | 74.2% | 81.1% |
| 2014 | 73.6% | 80.7% |
| 2013 | 72.9% | 80.3% |
| 2012 | 72.3% | 79.9% |
| 2011 | 71.6% | 79.5% |
| 2010 | 70.9% | 79.1% |
| 2009 | 70.1% | 78.8% |
| 2008 | 69.2% | 78.5% |
| 2007 | 68.4% | 78.2% |
| 2006 | 67.5% | 78% |
| 2005 | 66.6% | 77.7% |
| 2004 | 65.7% | 77.4% |
| 2003 | 64.8% | 77.1% |
| 2002 | 63.9% | 76.7% |
| 2001 | 62.9% | 76.4% |
| 2000 | 62% | 76% |
| 1999 | 60.7% | 75.6% |
| 1998 | 59.5% | 75% |
| 1997 | 58.2% | 74.5% |
| 1996 | 57% | 74.1% |
| 1995 | 55.7% | 73.8% |
| 1994 | 54.4% | 73.5% |
| 1993 | 53.1% | 73.1% |
| 1992 | 51.8% | 72.7% |
| 1991 | 50.6% | 72.3% |
| 1990 | 49.8% | 72% |
| 1989 | 49% | 71.8% |
| 1988 | 48.2% | 71.7% |
| 1987 | 47.5% | 71.6% |
| 1986 | 46.7% | 71.4% |
| 1985 | 45.9% | 71.3% |
| 1984 | 45.1% | 71.2% |
| 1983 | 44.3% | 71% |
| 1982 | 43.6% | 70.9% |
| 1981 | 42.8% | 70.8% |
| 1980 | 42% | 70.5% |
| 1979 | 41.2% | 70.1% |
| 1978 | 40.3% | 69.6% |
| 1977 | 39.4% | 69.1% |
| 1976 | 38.5% | 68.7% |
| 1975 | 37.7% | 68.2% |
| 1974 | 36.8% | 67.7% |
| 1973 | 35.9% | 67.2% |
| 1972 | 35.1% | 66.7% |
| 1971 | 34.3% | 66.2% |
| 1970 | 33.5% | 65.4% |
| 1969 | 32.7% | 63.9% |
| 1968 | 32% | 62.3% |
| 1967 | 31.3% | 60.8% |
| 1966 | 30.6% | 59.2% |
| 1965 | 29.9% | 57.6% |
| 1964 | 29.2% | 55.9% |
| 1963 | 28.6% | 54.3% |
| 1962 | 27.9% | 52.7% |
| 1961 | 27.2% | 51% |
| 1960 | 26.6% | 49.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 65.7% to 79.2% in Malaysia and from 77.4% to 84.3% in Norway.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Kuala Lumpur | 1.98M |
| Klang | 878K |
| Ipoh | 867K |
| Johor Bahru | 798K |
| George Town | 794K |
| Shah Alam | 741K |
| Subang Jaya | 708K |
| Petaling Jaya | 639K |
| Kuantan | 608K |
| Sungai Petani | 545K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons