Ecuador has a population density of 189.1 people per square mile compared to 87.2 people in Laos. Ecuador has 152,658 sq ft of land per person vs 328,051 sq ft in Laos. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Ecuador and Laos are ranked 117th and 150th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Ecuador has 0.22% of the world's population and 0.17% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.1% of the population and 0.15% of the land area for Laos, hence the population density in Ecuador is 116.9% higher than in Laos.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 189.1 ppl/mi² | 87.2 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 117/197 | 150/197 |
| Population |
18414090
|
7954155
|
| Land area | 95,892 sq mi | 89,112 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 147,409 sq ft | 319,739 sq ft |
| Rural population | 35% | 61.1% |
| Urban population | 65% | 38.9% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 24.3% | 0% |
Ecuador vs Laos:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Ecuador increased by 33.3%, compared to a 34.4% growth in Laos.
In 2004, Ecuador ranked 118th for population density and is in 117th place now. Laos was 150th in 2004 and still ranks 150th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 189.1 | 87.2 |
| 2023 | 187.5 | 86 |
| 2022 | 185.9 | 84.8 |
| 2021 | 184.4 | 83.6 |
| 2020 | 183 | 82.4 |
| 2019 | 180.8 | 81.2 |
| 2018 | 177.8 | 80 |
| 2017 | 174.8 | 78.8 |
| 2016 | 172.1 | 77.5 |
| 2015 | 169.6 | 76.3 |
| 2014 | 167.2 | 75.2 |
| 2013 | 164.8 | 74.2 |
| 2012 | 162.4 | 73.2 |
| 2011 | 159.8 | 72.1 |
| 2010 | 157.2 | 71.1 |
| 2009 | 154.6 | 70 |
| 2008 | 152 | 69 |
| 2007 | 149.4 | 68 |
| 2006 | 146.9 | 66.9 |
| 2005 | 144.4 | 65.9 |
| 2004 | 141.9 | 64.9 |
| 2003 | 139.5 | 63.9 |
| 2002 | 137 | 63 |
| 2001 | 134.6 | 62 |
| 2000 | 132.3 | 60.9 |
| 1999 | 130 | 59.9 |
| 1998 | 127.8 | 58.9 |
| 1997 | 112.6 | 57.8 |
| 1996 | 110.5 | 56.6 |
| 1995 | 108.4 | 55.3 |
| 1994 | 106.4 | 54 |
| 1993 | 104.4 | 52.6 |
| 1992 | 102.3 | 51.2 |
| 1991 | 100.1 | 49.8 |
| 1990 | 98 | 48.4 |
| 1989 | 95.8 | 47 |
| 1988 | 93.7 | 45.7 |
| 1987 | 91.5 | 44.4 |
| 1986 | 89.3 | 43.2 |
| 1985 | 87.1 | 42 |
| 1984 | 84.9 | 40.8 |
| 1983 | 82.7 | 39.7 |
| 1982 | 80.6 | 38.7 |
| 1981 | 78.5 | 37.8 |
| 1980 | 76.4 | 36.9 |
| 1979 | 74.4 | 36.2 |
| 1978 | 72.4 | 35.6 |
| 1977 | 70.4 | 35 |
| 1976 | 68.5 | 34.4 |
| 1975 | 66.6 | 33.7 |
| 1974 | 64.7 | 33 |
| 1973 | 62.9 | 32.2 |
| 1972 | 61.1 | 31.4 |
| 1971 | 59.3 | 30.7 |
| 1970 | 57.6 | 30 |
| 1969 | 55.9 | 29.3 |
| 1968 | 54.3 | 28.6 |
| 1967 | 52.7 | 27.9 |
| 1966 | 51.1 | 27.3 |
| 1965 | 49.6 | 26.7 |
| 1964 | 48.2 | 26.1 |
| 1963 | 46.8 | 25.5 |
| 1962 | 45.5 | 24.9 |
| 1961 | 44.2 | 24.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 65% | 38.9% |
| 2023 | 64.8% | 38.2% |
| 2022 | 64.6% | 37.6% |
| 2021 | 64.4% | 36.9% |
| 2020 | 64.2% | 36.3% |
| 2019 | 64% | 35.6% |
| 2018 | 63.8% | 35% |
| 2017 | 63.7% | 34.4% |
| 2016 | 63.5% | 33.7% |
| 2015 | 63.4% | 33.1% |
| 2014 | 63.3% | 32.5% |
| 2013 | 63.1% | 31.9% |
| 2012 | 63% | 31.3% |
| 2011 | 62.9% | 30.7% |
| 2010 | 62.7% | 30.1% |
| 2009 | 62.5% | 29.5% |
| 2008 | 62.3% | 28.9% |
| 2007 | 62.1% | 28.3% |
| 2006 | 61.9% | 27.7% |
| 2005 | 61.7% | 27.2% |
| 2004 | 61.5% | 26.2% |
| 2003 | 61.3% | 25.1% |
| 2002 | 61.1% | 24% |
| 2001 | 60.8% | 23% |
| 2000 | 60.3% | 22% |
| 1999 | 59.8% | 21% |
| 1998 | 59.3% | 20% |
| 1997 | 58.8% | 19.1% |
| 1996 | 58.3% | 18.2% |
| 1995 | 57.8% | 17.4% |
| 1994 | 57.3% | 16.9% |
| 1993 | 56.7% | 16.5% |
| 1992 | 56.2% | 16.1% |
| 1991 | 55.7% | 15.8% |
| 1990 | 55.1% | 15.4% |
| 1989 | 54.3% | 15.1% |
| 1988 | 53.5% | 14.8% |
| 1987 | 52.8% | 14.4% |
| 1986 | 52% | 14.1% |
| 1985 | 51.2% | 13.8% |
| 1984 | 50.4% | 13.5% |
| 1983 | 49.7% | 13.2% |
| 1982 | 48.8% | 12.9% |
| 1981 | 47.9% | 12.7% |
| 1980 | 47% | 12.4% |
| 1979 | 46% | 12.1% |
| 1978 | 45.1% | 11.8% |
| 1977 | 44.2% | 11.6% |
| 1976 | 43.3% | 11.3% |
| 1975 | 42.4% | 11.1% |
| 1974 | 41.5% | 10.8% |
| 1973 | 40.9% | 10.6% |
| 1972 | 40.4% | 10.3% |
| 1971 | 39.8% | 9.95% |
| 1970 | 39.3% | 9.63% |
| 1969 | 38.7% | 9.3% |
| 1968 | 38.2% | 8.99% |
| 1967 | 37.7% | 8.69% |
| 1966 | 37.2% | 8.4% |
| 1965 | 36.6% | 8.32% |
| 1964 | 36.1% | 8.25% |
| 1963 | 35.6% | 8.17% |
| 1962 | 35.1% | 8.1% |
| 1961 | 34.5% | 8.02% |
| 1960 | 33.9% | 7.95% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 61.5% to 65% in Ecuador and from 26.2% to 38.9% in Laos.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Guayaquil | 2.65M |
| Quito | 1.76M |
| Cuenca | 362K |
| Santo Domingo | 335K |
| Duran | 295K |
| Machala | 288K |
| Manta | 259K |
| Portoviejo | 244K |
| Loja | 203K |
| Quevedo | 178K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Vientiane | 948K |
| Thakhek | 90.8K |
| Luang Prabang | 53.8K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons