Paraguay has a population density of 45.3 people per square mile compared to 111.4 people in Zimbabwe. Paraguay has 631,864 sq ft of land per person vs 252,854 sq ft in Zimbabwe. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Paraguay and Zimbabwe are ranked 176th and 145th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Paraguay has 0.09% of the world's population and 0.27% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.2% of the population and 0.26% of the land area for Zimbabwe, hence the population density in Paraguay is 59.3% lower than in Zimbabwe.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 45.3 ppl/mi² | 111.4 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 176/197 | 145/197 |
| Population |
7079103
|
17210092
|
| Land area | 152,901 sq mi | 149,364 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 615,174 sq ft | 250,326 sq ft |
| Rural population | 36.5% | 67.3% |
| Urban population | 63.5% | 32.7% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 22.8% |
Paraguay vs Zimbabwe:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Paraguay increased by 29%, compared to a 34.5% growth in Zimbabwe.
In 2004, Paraguay ranked 168th for population density and is in 176th place now. Zimbabwe was 144th in 2004 and ranks 145th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 45.3 | 111.4 |
| 2023 | 44.8 | 109.4 |
| 2022 | 44.2 | 107.6 |
| 2021 | 43.6 | 105.8 |
| 2020 | 43 | 104 |
| 2019 | 42.5 | 102.2 |
| 2018 | 41.9 | 100.7 |
| 2017 | 41.3 | 99.2 |
| 2016 | 40.7 | 97.8 |
| 2015 | 40.2 | 96.4 |
| 2014 | 39.6 | 95.1 |
| 2013 | 39 | 93.8 |
| 2012 | 38.4 | 92.5 |
| 2011 | 37.9 | 91 |
| 2010 | 37.4 | 89.4 |
| 2009 | 37 | 88 |
| 2008 | 36.6 | 86.8 |
| 2007 | 36.2 | 85.7 |
| 2006 | 35.9 | 84.6 |
| 2005 | 35.5 | 83.6 |
| 2004 | 35.1 | 82.8 |
| 2003 | 34.7 | 81.9 |
| 2002 | 34.3 | 80.9 |
| 2001 | 33.8 | 80.2 |
| 2000 | 33.3 | 79.6 |
| 1999 | 32.6 | 78.9 |
| 1998 | 31.9 | 77.6 |
| 1997 | 31.3 | 76.1 |
| 1996 | 30.6 | 74.7 |
| 1995 | 29.9 | 73.5 |
| 1994 | 29.1 | 72.8 |
| 1993 | 28.4 | 72.7 |
| 1992 | 27.7 | 71.7 |
| 1991 | 27 | 69.7 |
| 1990 | 26.3 | 67.9 |
| 1989 | 25.6 | 66 |
| 1988 | 24.9 | 64.2 |
| 1987 | 24.2 | 62.2 |
| 1986 | 23.5 | 60.1 |
| 1985 | 22.9 | 58.2 |
| 1984 | 22.2 | 56.2 |
| 1983 | 21.6 | 54.2 |
| 1982 | 21 | 52.2 |
| 1981 | 20.5 | 50.2 |
| 1980 | 19.9 | 47.1 |
| 1979 | 19.4 | 44.5 |
| 1978 | 18.9 | 43.8 |
| 1977 | 18.4 | 43.2 |
| 1976 | 18 | 42.1 |
| 1975 | 17.5 | 40.8 |
| 1974 | 17.1 | 39.6 |
| 1973 | 16.7 | 38.3 |
| 1972 | 16.3 | 37.1 |
| 1971 | 15.9 | 36 |
| 1970 | 15.6 | 34.9 |
| 1969 | 15.2 | 33.9 |
| 1968 | 14.9 | 32.8 |
| 1967 | 14.5 | 31.8 |
| 1966 | 14.2 | 30.8 |
| 1965 | 13.9 | 29.8 |
| 1964 | 13.5 | 28.9 |
| 1963 | 13.2 | 28 |
| 1962 | 12.9 | 27.2 |
| 1961 | 12.6 | 26.3 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 63.5% | 32.7% |
| 2023 | 63.1% | 32.5% |
| 2022 | 62.8% | 32.4% |
| 2021 | 62.5% | 32.3% |
| 2020 | 62.2% | 32.2% |
| 2019 | 61.9% | 32.2% |
| 2018 | 61.6% | 32.2% |
| 2017 | 61.3% | 32.2% |
| 2016 | 61% | 32.3% |
| 2015 | 60.7% | 32.4% |
| 2014 | 60.5% | 32.5% |
| 2013 | 60.2% | 32.7% |
| 2012 | 59.9% | 32.8% |
| 2011 | 59.6% | 33% |
| 2010 | 59.3% | 33.2% |
| 2009 | 58.9% | 33.4% |
| 2008 | 58.6% | 33.6% |
| 2007 | 58.3% | 33.7% |
| 2006 | 58% | 33.9% |
| 2005 | 57.6% | 34.1% |
| 2004 | 57.3% | 34.3% |
| 2003 | 57% | 34.5% |
| 2002 | 56.6% | 34.6% |
| 2001 | 56% | 34.2% |
| 2000 | 55.3% | 33.8% |
| 1999 | 54.7% | 33.3% |
| 1998 | 54.1% | 32.9% |
| 1997 | 53.4% | 32.5% |
| 1996 | 52.8% | 32.1% |
| 1995 | 52.1% | 31.7% |
| 1994 | 51.5% | 31.3% |
| 1993 | 50.8% | 30.9% |
| 1992 | 50.2% | 30.5% |
| 1991 | 49.4% | 29.7% |
| 1990 | 48.7% | 29% |
| 1989 | 47.9% | 28.2% |
| 1988 | 47.2% | 27.5% |
| 1987 | 46.5% | 26.8% |
| 1986 | 45.7% | 26.1% |
| 1985 | 45% | 25.4% |
| 1984 | 44.2% | 24.7% |
| 1983 | 43.5% | 24.1% |
| 1982 | 42.8% | 23.4% |
| 1981 | 42.2% | 22.9% |
| 1980 | 41.7% | 22.4% |
| 1979 | 41.1% | 21.9% |
| 1978 | 40.6% | 21.3% |
| 1977 | 40.1% | 20.8% |
| 1976 | 39.5% | 20.4% |
| 1975 | 39% | 19.9% |
| 1974 | 38.4% | 19.4% |
| 1973 | 37.9% | 18.9% |
| 1972 | 37.4% | 18.4% |
| 1971 | 37.2% | 17.9% |
| 1970 | 37.1% | 17.4% |
| 1969 | 36.9% | 16.9% |
| 1968 | 36.7% | 16.3% |
| 1967 | 36.6% | 15.7% |
| 1966 | 36.4% | 15.2% |
| 1965 | 36.2% | 14.6% |
| 1964 | 36.1% | 14.1% |
| 1963 | 35.9% | 13.6% |
| 1962 | 35.8% | 13.1% |
| 1961 | 35.7% | 12.8% |
| 1960 | 35.6% | 12.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 57.3% to 63.5% in Paraguay and from 34.3% to 32.7% in Zimbabwe.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Asuncion | 462K |
| Ciudad del Este | 350K |
| Luque | 260K |
| San Lorenzo | 225K |
| Pedro Juan Caballero | 127K |
| Caaguazu | 127K |
| Encarnacion | 107K |
| Coronel Oviedo | 52.4K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons