Mozambique has a population density of 114.1 people per square mile compared to 136.7 people in South Africa. Mozambique has 249,142 sq ft of land per person vs 205,338 sq ft in South Africa. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Mozambique and South Africa are ranked 144th and 136th, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Mozambique has 0.43% of the world's population and 0.53% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.79% of the population and 0.81% of the land area for South Africa, hence the population density in Mozambique is 16.5% lower than in South Africa.
Population density comparison
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 114.1 ppl/mi² | 136.7 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 144/197 | 136/197 |
| Population |
36441519
|
65314246
|
| Land area | 303,623 sq mi | 468,377 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 244,415 sq ft | 204,002 sq ft |
| Rural population | 60.7% | 30.7% |
| Urban population | 39.3% | 69.3% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 6.25% | 14.8% |
Mozambique vs South Africa:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Mozambique increased by 74.6%, compared to a 30.6% growth in South Africa.
In 2004, Mozambique ranked 148th for population density and is in 144th place now. South Africa was 132nd in 2004 and ranks 136th out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 114.1 | 136.7 |
| 2023 | 110.8 | 135 |
| 2022 | 107.6 | 133.2 |
| 2021 | 104.4 | 131.3 |
| 2020 | 101.4 | 129.3 |
| 2019 | 98.4 | 127.2 |
| 2018 | 95.6 | 125.1 |
| 2017 | 92.8 | 123.1 |
| 2016 | 90 | 122.3 |
| 2015 | 87.4 | 121.1 |
| 2014 | 84.9 | 118.7 |
| 2013 | 82.5 | 116.7 |
| 2012 | 80.2 | 114.8 |
| 2011 | 77.9 | 113.1 |
| 2010 | 75.7 | 111.8 |
| 2009 | 73.7 | 110.4 |
| 2008 | 71.9 | 109.1 |
| 2007 | 70.1 | 107.9 |
| 2006 | 68.5 | 106.7 |
| 2005 | 66.9 | 105.7 |
| 2004 | 65.3 | 104.6 |
| 2003 | 63.9 | 103.5 |
| 2002 | 62.4 | 102.5 |
| 2001 | 61.1 | 101.6 |
| 2000 | 59.7 | 100.7 |
| 1999 | 58.4 | 99.8 |
| 1998 | 57.1 | 98.7 |
| 1997 | 55.8 | 97.5 |
| 1996 | 54.3 | 96.3 |
| 1995 | 52.6 | 95.1 |
| 1994 | 49.5 | 94 |
| 1993 | 46.3 | 92.4 |
| 1992 | 44.8 | 90.6 |
| 1991 | 44 | 89 |
| 1990 | 43.1 | 87 |
| 1989 | 42.5 | 84.6 |
| 1988 | 42.2 | 82.2 |
| 1987 | 42.2 | 79.7 |
| 1986 | 42.1 | 77.2 |
| 1985 | 41.3 | 74.8 |
| 1984 | 40.6 | 72.4 |
| 1983 | 39.8 | 69.9 |
| 1982 | 38.9 | 67.5 |
| 1981 | 38.1 | 65.2 |
| 1980 | 37.3 | 63 |
| 1979 | 36.3 | 61.1 |
| 1978 | 35 | 59.5 |
| 1977 | 33.7 | 57.9 |
| 1976 | 32.5 | 56.4 |
| 1975 | 31.4 | 54.9 |
| 1974 | 30.4 | 53.4 |
| 1973 | 29.5 | 51.9 |
| 1972 | 28.6 | 50.4 |
| 1971 | 27.9 | 49 |
| 1970 | 27.2 | 47.6 |
| 1969 | 26.6 | 46.1 |
| 1968 | 26 | 44.7 |
| 1967 | 25.4 | 43.4 |
| 1966 | 24.9 | 42 |
| 1965 | 24.4 | 40.8 |
| 1964 | 23.9 | 39.5 |
| 1963 | 23.4 | 38.3 |
| 1962 | 23 | 37.2 |
| 1961 | 22.5 | 36.1 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2024 | 39.3% | 69.3% |
| 2023 | 38.8% | 68.8% |
| 2022 | 38.2% | 68.3% |
| 2021 | 37.6% | 67.8% |
| 2020 | 37.1% | 67.4% |
| 2019 | 36.5% | 66.9% |
| 2018 | 36% | 66.4% |
| 2017 | 35.5% | 65.8% |
| 2016 | 34.9% | 65.3% |
| 2015 | 34.4% | 64.8% |
| 2014 | 33.9% | 64.3% |
| 2013 | 33.4% | 63.8% |
| 2012 | 32.8% | 63.3% |
| 2011 | 32.3% | 62.7% |
| 2010 | 31.8% | 62.2% |
| 2009 | 31.3% | 61.7% |
| 2008 | 30.8% | 61.2% |
| 2007 | 30.4% | 60.6% |
| 2006 | 30.2% | 60.1% |
| 2005 | 30% | 59.5% |
| 2004 | 29.8% | 59% |
| 2003 | 29.6% | 58.4% |
| 2002 | 29.5% | 57.9% |
| 2001 | 29.3% | 57.4% |
| 2000 | 29.1% | 56.9% |
| 1999 | 28.9% | 56.4% |
| 1998 | 28.7% | 55.9% |
| 1997 | 28.5% | 55.4% |
| 1996 | 28% | 55% |
| 1995 | 27.5% | 54.5% |
| 1994 | 27% | 54% |
| 1993 | 26.5% | 53.5% |
| 1992 | 26% | 53% |
| 1991 | 25.5% | 52.6% |
| 1990 | 25% | 52% |
| 1989 | 23.5% | 51.5% |
| 1988 | 22.2% | 51% |
| 1987 | 20.8% | 50.4% |
| 1986 | 19.5% | 49.9% |
| 1985 | 18.3% | 49.4% |
| 1984 | 17.2% | 49.1% |
| 1983 | 16.1% | 48.9% |
| 1982 | 15% | 48.8% |
| 1981 | 14.1% | 48.6% |
| 1980 | 13.2% | 48.4% |
| 1979 | 12.7% | 48.3% |
| 1978 | 12.2% | 48.3% |
| 1977 | 11.7% | 48.2% |
| 1976 | 11.3% | 48.2% |
| 1975 | 10.9% | 48.1% |
| 1974 | 10.5% | 48% |
| 1973 | 10.1% | 48% |
| 1972 | 9.67% | 47.9% |
| 1971 | 9.3% | 47.9% |
| 1970 | 8.99% | 47.8% |
| 1969 | 8.75% | 47.7% |
| 1968 | 8.52% | 47.6% |
| 1967 | 8.3% | 47.5% |
| 1966 | 8.07% | 47.4% |
| 1965 | 7.86% | 47.2% |
| 1964 | 7.65% | 47.1% |
| 1963 | 7.45% | 47% |
| 1962 | 7.25% | 46.9% |
| 1961 | 7.05% | 46.8% |
| 1960 | 6.87% | 46.6% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 29.8% to 39.3% in Mozambique and from 59% to 69.3% in South Africa.
Densely populated cities
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Maputo | 1.13M |
| Matola | 1.03M |
| Nampula | 743K |
| Beira | 531K |
| Quelimane | 350K |
| Chimoio | 239K |
| Nacala | 225K |
| Tete | 153K |
| Pemba | 141K |
| Xai-Xai | 116K |
|
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Johannesburg | 4.43M |
| Cape Town | 3.78M |
| Soweto | 1.27M |
| Pietermaritzburg | 839K |
| Pretoria | 742K |
| Durban | 595K |
| Rustenburg | 550K |
| Randburg | 337K |
| Port Elizabeth | 312K |
| East London | 267K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons