Jamaica has a population density of 679 people per square mile compared to 39.6 people in Norway. Jamaica has 41,673 sq ft of land per person vs 744,101 sq ft in Norway. In the list of countries ranked from the most to the least densely populated, Jamaica and Norway are ranked 41st and 182nd, respectively.
Population density is calculated as the ratio of population to land area. Jamaica has 0.03% of the world's population and 0.007% of the land area of all countries, compared to 0.07% of the population and 0.24% of the land area for Norway, hence the population density in Jamaica is 1,614% higher than in Norway.
Population density comparison
Jamaica
|
Norway
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Population density | 679 ppl/mi² | 39.6 ppl/mi² |
| Population density rank | 41/197 | 182/197 |
| Population |
2837071
|
5642662
|
| Land area | 4,181 sq mi | 140,645 sq mi |
| Land area per capita | 41,059 sq ft | 703,657 sq ft |
| Rural population | 42.2% | 15.7% |
| Urban population | 57.8% | 84.3% |
| Living in agglomerations of 1M+ people | 0% | 0% |
Jamaica vs Norway:
Population density chart by year
From 2004 to 2024, population density in Jamaica increased by 6.25%, compared to a 21.7% growth in Norway.
In 2004, Jamaica ranked 36th for population density and is in 41st place now. Norway was 169th in 2004 and ranks 182nd out of 197 currently.
people per square mile
| Year | Population density | |
|---|---|---|
|
Jamaica
|
Norway
|
|
| 2024 | 679 | 39.6 |
| 2023 | 679 | 39.2 |
| 2022 | 679 | 38.8 |
| 2021 | 679 | 38.5 |
| 2020 | 677 | 38.2 |
| 2019 | 675 | 37.9 |
| 2018 | 674 | 37.7 |
| 2017 | 673 | 37.4 |
| 2016 | 672 | 37.1 |
| 2015 | 670 | 36.8 |
| 2014 | 668 | 36.4 |
| 2013 | 666 | 36 |
| 2012 | 663 | 35.6 |
| 2011 | 660 | 35.1 |
| 2010 | 657 | 34.7 |
| 2009 | 655 | 34.2 |
| 2008 | 652 | 33.8 |
| 2007 | 649 | 33.4 |
| 2006 | 646 | 33 |
| 2005 | 643 | 32.8 |
| 2004 | 639 | 32.6 |
| 2003 | 635 | 32.4 |
| 2002 | 631 | 32.2 |
| 2001 | 628 | 32 |
| 2000 | 624 | 31.8 |
| 1999 | 619 | 31.6 |
| 1998 | 615 | 31.4 |
| 1997 | 609 | 31.2 |
| 1996 | 604 | 31.1 |
| 1995 | 598 | 30.9 |
| 1994 | 592 | 30.8 |
| 1993 | 586 | 30.6 |
| 1992 | 580 | 30.4 |
| 1991 | 574 | 30.2 |
| 1990 | 569 | 30.1 |
| 1989 | 565 | 30 |
| 1988 | 561 | 29.8 |
| 1987 | 557 | 29.7 |
| 1986 | 553 | 29.6 |
| 1985 | 548 | 29.4 |
| 1984 | 542 | 29.4 |
| 1983 | 534 | 29.3 |
| 1982 | 527 | 29.2 |
| 1981 | 520 | 29.1 |
| 1980 | 513 | 29 |
| 1979 | 507 | 28.9 |
| 1978 | 501 | 28.8 |
| 1977 | 495 | 28.7 |
| 1976 | 489 | 28.5 |
| 1975 | 483 | 28.4 |
| 1974 | 476 | 28.3 |
| 1973 | 469 | 28.1 |
| 1972 | 462 | 27.9 |
| 1971 | 455 | 27.7 |
| 1970 | 449 | 27.5 |
| 1969 | 444 | 27.3 |
| 1968 | 439 | 27.1 |
| 1967 | 434 | 26.8 |
| 1966 | 428 | 26.6 |
| 1965 | 423 | 26.4 |
| 1964 | 417 | 26.2 |
| 1963 | 412 | 26 |
| 1962 | 406 | 25.8 |
| 1961 | 400 | 25.6 |
Share of urban population by year
| Year | Urban population | |
|---|---|---|
|
Jamaica
|
Norway
|
|
| 2024 | 57.8% | 84.3% |
| 2023 | 57.4% | 84% |
| 2022 | 57% | 83.7% |
| 2021 | 56.7% | 83.3% |
| 2020 | 56.3% | 83% |
| 2019 | 56% | 82.6% |
| 2018 | 55.7% | 82.2% |
| 2017 | 55.4% | 81.9% |
| 2016 | 55.1% | 81.5% |
| 2015 | 54.8% | 81.1% |
| 2014 | 54.6% | 80.7% |
| 2013 | 54.4% | 80.3% |
| 2012 | 54.1% | 79.9% |
| 2011 | 53.9% | 79.5% |
| 2010 | 53.7% | 79.1% |
| 2009 | 53.6% | 78.8% |
| 2008 | 53.4% | 78.5% |
| 2007 | 53.2% | 78.2% |
| 2006 | 53% | 78% |
| 2005 | 52.8% | 77.7% |
| 2004 | 52.6% | 77.4% |
| 2003 | 52.4% | 77.1% |
| 2002 | 52.3% | 76.7% |
| 2001 | 52.1% | 76.4% |
| 2000 | 51.8% | 76% |
| 1999 | 51.6% | 75.6% |
| 1998 | 51.3% | 75% |
| 1997 | 51.1% | 74.5% |
| 1996 | 50.9% | 74.1% |
| 1995 | 50.6% | 73.8% |
| 1994 | 50.4% | 73.5% |
| 1993 | 50.1% | 73.1% |
| 1992 | 49.9% | 72.7% |
| 1991 | 49.7% | 72.3% |
| 1990 | 49.4% | 72% |
| 1989 | 49.2% | 71.8% |
| 1988 | 49% | 71.7% |
| 1987 | 48.8% | 71.6% |
| 1986 | 48.6% | 71.4% |
| 1985 | 48.4% | 71.3% |
| 1984 | 48.2% | 71.2% |
| 1983 | 48% | 71% |
| 1982 | 47.8% | 70.9% |
| 1981 | 47.3% | 70.8% |
| 1980 | 46.7% | 70.5% |
| 1979 | 46.2% | 70.1% |
| 1978 | 45.6% | 69.6% |
| 1977 | 45.1% | 69.1% |
| 1976 | 44.6% | 68.7% |
| 1975 | 44% | 68.2% |
| 1974 | 43.5% | 67.7% |
| 1973 | 42.9% | 67.2% |
| 1972 | 42.4% | 66.7% |
| 1971 | 41.9% | 66.2% |
| 1970 | 41.3% | 65.4% |
| 1969 | 40.6% | 63.9% |
| 1968 | 39.8% | 62.3% |
| 1967 | 39% | 60.8% |
| 1966 | 38.3% | 59.2% |
| 1965 | 37.5% | 57.6% |
| 1964 | 36.7% | 55.9% |
| 1963 | 36% | 54.3% |
| 1962 | 35.2% | 52.7% |
| 1961 | 34.5% | 51% |
| 1960 | 33.8% | 49.9% |
From 2004 to 2024 share of the urban population changed from 52.6% to 57.8% in Jamaica and from 77.4% to 84.3% in Norway.
Densely populated cities
|
Jamaica
|
|
|---|---|
| City | Population |
| Kingston | 580K |
| Spanish Town | 131K |
| Montego Bay | 124K |
| Half Way Tree | 96.5K |
| May Pen | 61.5K |
Compare countries by 7 more topics
Population density in other countries
people per square mile
Population density
Relevant pages:
By topic
vs
comparisons:
Population density comparisons
